harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Accept JDWP contribution in HARMONY-6187
Date Tue, 12 May 2009 11:16:11 GMT
+1

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Sian January
<sianjanuary@googlemail.com>wrote:

> +1
>
> 2009/5/11 Oliver Deakin <oliver.deakin@googlemail.com>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this
> contribution
> > and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to officially
> accept
> > the contribution.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept this contribution
> > [ ] -1 Reject this contribution because...
> >
> > I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more time.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Oliver
> >
> >
> > Oliver Deakin wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch
> so
> >> that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java releases. We
> >> began working in that mirror because it was convenient for our internal
> >> builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made back into Harmony as
> we
> >> went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and releases came and went
> those
> >> plans did not come into fruition - until now :)
> >>
> >> I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP
> >> agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187
> [1]
> >> for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following
> >> enhancements:
> >> - A large number of bug fixes.
> >> - Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC
> >> 32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64.
> >> - As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been
> >> removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries.
> >> - JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of
> >> non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs.
> >> - Significant performance improvements.
> >>
> >> All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to
> be
> >> done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd rather
> do
> >> that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let me know if
> there
> >> are any objections/comments to this contribution! I'll give it a few
> days
> >> and then start a vote.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Oliver
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Oliver Deakin
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
> Hampshire
> > PO6 3AU
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>



-- 
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://www.telecom-express.ru/
http://people.apache.org/~aaf/
http://harmony.apache.org/
http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message