harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Zhou <zhoukevi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Accept JDWP contribution in HARMONY-6187
Date Tue, 12 May 2009 06:38:00 GMT
+1
That's great.

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oliver Deakin wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this contribution
>> and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to officially accept
>> the contribution.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept this contribution
>> [ ] -1 Reject this contribution because...
>>
>> I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more time.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Oliver
>>
>>
>> Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch so
>>> that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java releases. We
>>> began working in that mirror because it was convenient for our internal
>>> builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made back into Harmony as we
>>> went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and releases came and went those
>>> plans did not come into fruition - until now :)
>>>
>>> I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP
>>> agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187 [1]
>>> for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following
>>> enhancements:
>>> - A large number of bug fixes.
>>> - Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC
>>> 32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64.
>>> - As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been
>>> removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries.
>>> - JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of
>>> non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs.
>>> - Significant performance improvements.
>>>
>>> All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to be
>>> done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd rather do
>>> that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let me know if there
>>> are any objections/comments to this contribution! I'll give it a few days
>>> and then start a vote.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> +1
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message