harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ilya Berezhniuk <ilya.berezhn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Accept JDWP contribution in HARMONY-6187
Date Wed, 13 May 2009 21:44:37 GMT
+1

2009/5/13 Tony Wu <wuyuehao@gmail.com>

> +1
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Oliver Deakin wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this
> >> contribution and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to
> >> officially accept the contribution.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Accept this contribution
> >> [ ] -1 Reject this contribution because...
> >>
> >> I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more
> time.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Oliver
> >>
> >>
> >> Oliver Deakin wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch
> >>> so that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java
> >>> releases. We began working in that mirror because it was convenient
> >>> for our internal builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made
> >>> back into Harmony as we went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and
> >>> releases came and went those plans did not come into fruition - until
> >>> now :)
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP
> >>> agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187
> >>> [1] for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following
> >>> enhancements:
> >>> - A large number of bug fixes.
> >>> - Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC
> >>> 32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64.
> >>> - As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been
> >>> removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries.
> >>> - JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of
> >>> non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs.
> >>> - Significant performance improvements.
> >>>
> >>> All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to
> >>> be done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd
> >>> rather do that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let
> >>> me know if there are any objections/comments to this contribution!
> >>> I'll give it a few days and then start a vote.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Oliver
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Tony Wu
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>



-- 
Ilya.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message