harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From seb...@gmail.com
Subject Re: [general] NOTICE file does not have required contents (HARMONY-6155)
Date Wed, 06 May 2009 17:12:37 GMT
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Sebb commented on HARMONY-6155:
>> I think there are still some tweaks to be made.
>> There seem to be some items missing from the NOTICE file - I
>> would expect this to mention most, if not all, of the 3rd party items.
>> For example:
>> ICU4C 
>> Copyright (c) 1995-2005 International Business Machines Corporation and others
>> All rights reserved.
> What are the criteria you are applying to determine which third-party
> items are put in the NOTICE file rather than the LICENSE file?


"2. The remainder of the NOTICE file is to be used for required 
third-party notices."

> If you take a look at the (canonical) example of httpd's NOTICE [1] and
> LICENSE [2] you can see similar distinctions.
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE?view=co
> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE?view=co

Exactly, the NOTICE file contains the attributions, the LICENSE file 
contains the licenses.

As far as I can tell, at least some of the Hrmony licenses require 

>> [BTW, do you still use both versions of ICU4C?]
> No.  Why do you ask?  Are you confusing the ICU4C and ICU4J entries?

Yes, sorry.

>> ZLIB version 1.2.3
>>  (C) 1995-2004 Jean-loup Gailly and Mark Adler
>> etc. 
>> But not Apache Yoko, and probably not necessary for the IETF RFCs
> Regards,
> Tim

View raw message