harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [M10] Testing
Date Thu, 28 May 2009 13:33:41 GMT

In message <200905280900.n4S90cAv006979@d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com>,
Mark Hindess writes:
> In message <4A1D5B2E.7060600@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I've just run the classlib tests on Windows x86 on the latest code in 
> > the federated build and I don't see anything catastrophic there. There's 
> > 1 failure in the portlib tests, in hymmap, which I think is a test case 
> > off-by-one error. I've attached a patch [1] which fixes the test. Apart 
> > from that we look clean.
> > 
> > Does anyone have any other test reports? Any other platforms? I'm 
> > assuming we're taking r778555 as our testing base for M10.
> I think we said we were going to test building from source this time
> around so I'm testing that:
>   ant bundle-src
>   tar xzf target/apache-harmony-src-r778555-snapshot.tar.gz
>   cd apache-harmony-src-r778555
>   ant fetch-depends snapshot
>   ant -Dtest.jre.home=$PWD/target/hdk/jdk/jre -f working_classlib/build.xml test
> works on Linux.  We need to check that this builds a sane binary
> snapshot with the correct version information in the various jars, etc.
> I'll report back once my test run is complete.

Well, I had some test failures caused by timeouts in BasicSwingTestCase.
For example:


  Failure  Test interrupted due timeout              10.094
  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Test interrupted due timeout
    at javax.swing.BasicSwingTestCase.runBare (BasicSwingTestCase.java:147)

but I've seen these before on my laptop so they aren't blockers for M10.
I also had two test crashes:


which were both fixed by Ilya's patch in HARMONY-6132.

I think it would be good to apply the patch from HARMONY-6132 before M10.
Does anyone else support/oppose this?


View raw message