Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14812 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2009 12:07:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2009 12:07:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 29039 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2009 12:07:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 28975 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2009 12:07:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 28964 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2009 12:07:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:07:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.153] (HELO yw-out-1718.google.com) (74.125.46.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:06:53 +0000 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so2426960ywa.0 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:06:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wsIVeOL9I0uEw126wh2USJKa7S4Fsl81+BlJWTmpqek=; b=cPom/VI2aHFJ/zAZCOqWw60QX8lIEwSbfuTgFvR43VvSLfKCrQ/qPIc+svRlFDLUq4 lnuSMJqwHY7P8OTrtWcrs8o71++jDD6vLxW9p/VXYTtxDXypltlUlFsiCV+n+KkQrnps UZsCi4N6vlqKLpOCPP2fIO971ZCW1R15xicmI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rd0OK5Xjd5BPmimQnqmM7fLbEBJEWYVTtYY6/mnxzHeUUk7Va4CMr+y8kupBFkss/b pkt990Gi4Q2/xH2T6Cp5kLhdurhaNgukSOUDmKxSfWDpmqXh4tjAIG7p+2DFu2Eq/5Xx oq5xrDw2GqWCx4+7q7Bj84/+0RuCFV67CaAeU= Received: by 10.100.249.10 with SMTP id w10mr171728anh.156.1239797192426; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.20.183.65? (blueice2n1.uk.ibm.com [195.212.29.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d35sm3963520and.15.2009.04.15.05.06.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49E5CDC6.5020607@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:06:30 +0100 From: Tim Ellison User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [M9] Downloads page References: <49E46BA8.8000308@gmail.com> <22A92539-E23F-4303-B96C-8C4F140549D1@gmail.com> <200904150005.48232.gshimansky@apache.org> <3b3f27c60904141645h623af54i960554b7e47e8d07@mail.gmail.com> <49E5915D.8060307@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ian Rogers wrote: > Sorry to be a little off topic, would it be possible when making the > binaries to generate the pdb debugger symbols? We made a conscious decision to build the binary downloads in 'release mode'. As you know, it is possible to specify -Dhy.cfg=debug to get equivalent debug builds with pdb's. > I'm trying to debug a built Harmony M8 with my VM [1]. I'm using the > binary drop as I don't want to rely on Visual C, just the express > edition which doesn't come with ATL needed for a Harmony build. I can roll you a debug build as a one-off if you want? Regards, Tim > [1] http://mrp.codehaus.org/ > > 2009/4/15 Tim Ellison > >> yeah, sorry, I meant AMD64 :-) i.e. what in our build system we label >> as "x86_64" >> >> It would be good to provide a set of "windows-x86_64" binaries. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> Nathan Beyer wrote: >>> Ugh. I can't keep up anymore. IA-64 used to mean Intel Itanium >>> Architecture and Intel64 used to be EM64T. >>> >>> -Nathan >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Gregory Shimansky >>> wrote: >>>> On 14 April 2009 Nathan Beyer wrote: >>>>> Is IA64 itanium or x86-64? >>>> I guess it is x86-64 although the official naming for this platform by >> intel >>>> is intel64 (don't ask me why). Harmony verfion for Itanium on windows is >> even >>>> less supported than Itanium on linux which means most likely it doesn't >> even >>>> compile. >>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 5:55 AM, Tim Ellison >> wrote: >>>>>> I'm just in the process of updating our download page with links to >>>>>> Milestone M9 (r761593). >>>>>> >>>>>> As a courtesy we usually include multiple binary downloads too. I've >>>>>> got binaries for Windows and Linux IA32, and Linux IA64. We usually >>>>>> include a few more, so if anyone can help build the following I'd like >>>>>> to include them too: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Linux IA32 for systems with libstdc++.so.5 >>>>>> - Linux IA64 for systems with libstdc++.so.5 >>>>>> - Windows IA64 >>>>>> - Debian packages >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- > > >>>> Gregory >>>> >