Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95380 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 20:49:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 20:49:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 58075 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:49:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 57989 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:49:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 57978 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 20:49:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:49:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.174] (HELO mail-bw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.218.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:48:56 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so1108704bwz.36 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:48:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZzJ0QeCjH7r6YqvPMMnSwHvNvEj3givK0LRn42OK5oI=; b=FZ3D+OhNsx68jrA6b+tks1nynI1d5FyG4DMYxxD9iA+EGWeKGqOZqcF4KxlhFFLdFo cM60lAMlA9SXxyKKjF3wtHHbiz0/pKCFU9D26fNu8UdcdB7d3B1qIJrhyDZ//W+mVlJ0 Agl5jYDWqHV+V5HJXrwjWGMFpAwvifbnj2wNQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=eLYkhbI8GYDiwVhP56z3+4iz/QCJhrYAnCKENKjkEL3X31APjgYl8rChESoyY7ghD9 wl/ONDLEamA/wwIeiiv5nIqykwLlqiq6avSeqCrddZQSyWiFfGgXYwvgK3nhPbrHYooI r9fBJnOlucvWw9qm5N3IbCoerVgTuDTR1wn9w= Received: by 10.103.161.16 with SMTP id n16mr775790muo.79.1238791714135; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:48:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ([78.147.38.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm1580730mue.36.2009.04.03.13.48.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49D67620.5040406@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:48:32 +0100 From: Tim Ellison User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [M9] Final call for any blockers References: <5899fca70904030305scf1563end7f9d9c1a6812fde@mail.gmail.com> <49D5E16A.6030709@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <49D5E16A.6030709@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, sounds like we are good to go. Chunrong: Are you going to create the snapshots for r761593 (which will become M9)? Regards, Tim Oliver Deakin wrote: > Just ran all the classlib tests -awt,swing,imaeio with Egor's patch > applied on Linux x86 and we're clean bar the known issues, so Im ready > to vote :) > > Regards, > Oliver > > Tim Ellison wrote: >> At last, I think we have cleared all outstanding blockers for >> declaring M9. >> >> It has been quite a slog closing it down, caused I think by the extra >> long development cycle since M8, and we should learn from that. As >> always, there are some known issues outstanding, but nothing I am >> aware of that is a show stopper or regression since M8. >> >> Please speak up if you think there are any blockers left. I intend to >> start the vote soon. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >