harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Egor Pasko <egor.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [M9] Proposed patch for last blocker
Date Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:47:47 GMT
On the 0x588 day of Apache Harmony Tim Ellison wrote:
> 2009/4/3 Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>:
>> On the 0x588 day of Apache Harmony Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>> I just ran the concurrent tests with M8 and I see the same tests
>>> failing (some intermittently) along with some others, so I do not
>>> believe these are regressions in M9. Based on these failures not being
>>> regressions, and all other tests passing, I'd be happy to progress
>>> with declaring M9.
>> +1
> Egor, I just tested your HARMONY-6137 patch, and it fixes all these
> concurrent failures for me.
> I'll leave it up to your judgment about whether it is safe to apply in
> the closing moments of M9 (but it would be nice to have these
> resolved).

yey! I did not quite expect it to fix all failures :)

the patch is trivial (telling GCC that the assembly touches memory,
which it really does!). It may affect (GC) performance, but even if it
does correctness is more important.

so I am +1 to commit it.

Egor Pasko

View raw message