Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexei.fedotov@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.161 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=EeW6nc2bs4SLrfBCKrua9+bxQYV8ggBWZDz9fq2ifXpimP/fN9sru3Uw8yq8zG/M1N
         2TnVoJDyqXeBeE2BKA5dKJ6vv4cFkXtWknqsOSkunF3GH81AZ9lQdKobYQ9/tb2djP1v
         sBoY1EK0NeqBrfbvhKuDWu2DVXdUBNr6pa3b0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E1Ljfry-0006Xn-JA@pih-relay05.plus.net>
References: <fc2fc95c0903130359m521bbf6s99ef80ee94bb60a6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49BDC3FE.5020106@gmail.com>
	 <fc2fc95c0903160331r36f13667y34956f60c273a92b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49BF3858.5080503@gmail.com>
	 <fc2fc95c0903170808r21bafc34xb5d554eb22f8cd9a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49BFD516.6030602@gmail.com> <E1Ljfry-0006Xn-JA@pih-relay05.plus.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:34:51 +0300
Message-ID: <c30d70960903171334j24d9e3a0nff821cae1bab75c9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [M9] Testing - outstanding issues
From: Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Folks,
Do I understand correctly that RI correctly fires IOException for this
test case?

Thanks.


On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Mark Hindess
<mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> In message <49BFD516.6030602@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>>
>> Sian January wrote:
>> > Thanks Regis - that fixes the issue for me on Windows XP. =9AI'm happy
>> > to check it in if another committer agrees.
>>
>> Since we see it is a test case failure, and the fix does not affect the
>> implementation, I suggest that it waits until after the release is decla=
red.
>
> Since we see it is a test case failure, and the fix does not affect the
> implementation, I'd vote to fix it now. ;-)
>
> Junit stops a test method at the first failed assert so any failure
> could be hiding other "real" bugs, so if a test fix doesn't affect the
> implementation then I think I'd always be +1 for applying it as soon as
> possible.
>
> Regards,
> =9AMark.
>
>> > 2009/3/17 Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com>:
>> >> Sian January wrote:
>> >>> Ok - I have tried to list all the issues from the other thread below=
,
>> >>> but please add any I've missed.
>> >>>
>> >>> It would be good to put a name against each of these so that we know
>> >>> they are being looked into. =9AAny volunteers?
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. HttpURLConnectionTest and HttpsURLConnectionTest fail on some
>> >>> systems - change to use Jetty?
>> >>> 2. org.apache.harmony.archive.tests.java.util.jar.ManifestTest fails
>> >>> on Windows XP
>> >>> 3. RMI test failures on Linux
>> >>> 4. VM crash in classlib tests on Linux -
>> >>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest and
>> >>> org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest
>> >>> 5. Classlib test failures on Vista in
>> >>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
>> >>> and org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest
>> >>> 6. hymem.exe crashes on Vista
>> >>> 7. Various AWT/Swing crashes/ failures
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2009/3/16 Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com>:
>> >>>> Sian January wrote:
>> >>>>> It should be the end of code freeze today but I'm not sure we're r=
eady
>> >>>>> to vote on M9 yet without discussing all of the test failures that
>> >>>>> people have found.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> It seems like the HttpURLConnection tests are test errors rather t=
han
>> >>>>> bugs.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I also think that if something fails on Windows Vista and not on X=
P
>> >>>>> then we probably shouldn't consider it a blocker, though it would =
be
>> >>>>> nice to fix it in general.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> For awt and swing crashes, I think these are common (I don't think
>> >>>>> Churong runs them as part of the integrity test suite) and have be=
en
>> >>>>> allowed through in previous milestones, so I don't think these are
>> >>>>> blockers for M9.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Can anyone else offer opinions any of the other issues?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sian
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> I think all crash issues should be resolved before M9 shipped, even=
 some
>> >>>> =9Aare in previous milestones, it's time to fix them.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Best Regards,
>> >>>> Regis.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> I have created a JIRA HARMONY-6120 for HttpURLConnection tests, and a=
ttach
>> ed
>> >> a patch to use Jetty as test server, would anyone help to try it?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Regis.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>


--=20
=F3 =D5=D7=C1=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5=CD,
=E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C5=CA =E6=C5=C4=CF=D4=CF=D7,
http://people.apache.org/~aaf/