Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 212.159.7.36 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of mark.hindess@googlemail.com)
In-reply-to: <49BFD516.6030602@gmail.com> 
References: <fc2fc95c0903130359m521bbf6s99ef80ee94bb60a6@mail.gmail.com>
 <49BDC3FE.5020106@gmail.com>
 <fc2fc95c0903160331r36f13667y34956f60c273a92b@mail.gmail.com>
 <49BF3858.5080503@gmail.com>
 <fc2fc95c0903170808r21bafc34xb5d554eb22f8cd9a@mail.gmail.com>
 <49BFD516.6030602@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
   message dated "Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:51:34 +0000."
From: Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [M9] Testing - outstanding issues 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:25:58 +0000
Message-Id: <E1Ljfry-0006Xn-JA@pih-relay05.plus.net>


In message <49BFD516.6030602@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> Sian January wrote:
> > Thanks Regis - that fixes the issue for me on Windows XP.  I'm happy
> > to check it in if another committer agrees.
> 
> Since we see it is a test case failure, and the fix does not affect the
> implementation, I suggest that it waits until after the release is declared.

Since we see it is a test case failure, and the fix does not affect the
implementation, I'd vote to fix it now. ;-)

Junit stops a test method at the first failed assert so any failure
could be hiding other "real" bugs, so if a test fix doesn't affect the
implementation then I think I'd always be +1 for applying it as soon as
possible.

Regards,
 Mark.

> > 2009/3/17 Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com>:
> >> Sian January wrote:
> >>> Ok - I have tried to list all the issues from the other thread below,
> >>> but please add any I've missed.
> >>>
> >>> It would be good to put a name against each of these so that we know
> >>> they are being looked into.  Any volunteers?
> >>>
> >>> 1. HttpURLConnectionTest and HttpsURLConnectionTest fail on some
> >>> systems - change to use Jetty?
> >>> 2. org.apache.harmony.archive.tests.java.util.jar.ManifestTest fails
> >>> on Windows XP
> >>> 3. RMI test failures on Linux
> >>> 4. VM crash in classlib tests on Linux -
> >>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest and
> >>> org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest
> >>> 5. Classlib test failures on Vista in
> >>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
> >>> and org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest
> >>> 6. hymem.exe crashes on Vista
> >>> 7. Various AWT/Swing crashes/ failures
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2009/3/16 Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com>:
> >>>> Sian January wrote:
> >>>>> It should be the end of code freeze today but I'm not sure we're ready
> >>>>> to vote on M9 yet without discussing all of the test failures that
> >>>>> people have found.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It seems like the HttpURLConnection tests are test errors rather than
> >>>>> bugs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I also think that if something fails on Windows Vista and not on XP
> >>>>> then we probably shouldn't consider it a blocker, though it would be
> >>>>> nice to fix it in general.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For awt and swing crashes, I think these are common (I don't think
> >>>>> Churong runs them as part of the integrity test suite) and have been
> >>>>> allowed through in previous milestones, so I don't think these are
> >>>>> blockers for M9.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can anyone else offer opinions any of the other issues?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sian
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I think all crash issues should be resolved before M9 shipped, even some
> >>>>  are in previous milestones, it's time to fix them.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Regis.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I have created a JIRA HARMONY-6120 for HttpURLConnection tests, and attach
> ed
> >> a patch to use Jetty as test server, would anyone help to try it?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Regis.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
>