From dev-return-36441-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Wed Mar 18 07:29:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25564 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2009 07:29:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2009 07:29:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 92344 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2009 07:29:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 92318 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2009 07:29:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 92307 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2009 07:29:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:29:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of greensight@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.240] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:29:29 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b38so329467ana.0 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:29:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GUGNMHZjWqDviZV/XPySHj2b7MNHy/j7ZRX189cmWG0=; b=VbAXQQHHjS5O5CuxLUkdAL9RRdahJNOjgXgH0nddoG/HohlOvj1A/mqz5SB81AaTfE 1vZDBN5M4gQtQxLEv0zlsGuaX+2bJcJWRb3BHM9Z0o2ac4AUVyK0FtytXbPLMyzx/DQQ 3ZZjvI2j+NSxTipd20Be5+usNWojXpUyu5uKM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VCRkuu+hdGSiy0dGf/gyq/uPf4Pi6mDiOc9JNWHEQT6Xq1lw3Wok43LXwz7bBEJP5q +Mqht4+V7Fbohzj1+aV8XOZOfRt5/oofJ+NV5GBJzTyJbTLKJE9lx/cmD+Y+Kea4A8zL a+5Gca0VDZIOqx0mvny3aXTrucqcPag4qkopk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.230.11 with SMTP id c11mr388781wfh.219.1237361348490; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:29:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50638E6A-D120-4AC6-B827-0D9705DCB47A@gmail.com> References: <70c713190903060153v7316775eke4cea7846fdacd98@mail.gmail.com> <3b3f27c60903061624k2e197fa1v6c55225fc739a250@mail.gmail.com> <70c713190903122303u1ea0026k79ab72f24a3949ba@mail.gmail.com> <50638E6A-D120-4AC6-B827-0D9705DCB47A@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:29:08 +0800 Message-ID: <5e7fd1eb0903180029y5329156fj671f14d6f092c0e6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: DRLVM doesn't set java.endorsed.dirs system property From: Jack Cai To: dev@harmony.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2301aa2b7a104655fa34e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2301aa2b7a104655fa34e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Geronimo also uses this property. So better set it. -Jack 2009/3/14 Nathan Beyer > Agreed. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Kevin Zhou wrote: > > Our Impl doesn't have this feature. My suggestion is to implement this >> feature. >> >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Nathan Beyer wrote: >> >> Is there no endorsed directory feature at all or just this system >>> property value? I know Tomcat, among others, set the endorsed >>> directory during launch, so I'd say it's a necessary feature. >>> >>> -Nathan >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Kevin Zhou >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> When performing the given test [1] on HARMONY and RI, it shows RI >>>> >>> provides >>> >>>> such "java.endorsed.dirs" SYSTEM PROPERTY while HARMONY doesn't. >>>> >>>> Sometimes, JRE may search for JAR files in the endorsed directories in >>>> >>> order >>> >>>> to run some specific applications correctly. >>>> >>>> As for me, I think this is non-bug difference between HARMONY and RI. If >>>> necessary, it could be implemented at VM-side. >>>> >>>> Do we need to follow RI on this behaviour? What is your opinion? :) >>>> >>>> [1] Sample: >>>> public static void main(String[] args) { >>>> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.endorsed.dirs")); >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>> --000e0cd2301aa2b7a104655fa34e--