harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Beyer <nbe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [M9] Testing - outstanding issues
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:22:38 GMT
The crash I was seeing on Linux was in swing and awt. There is a lock  
assertion blowing up in x11. This seems to only happen on ubuntu 8.10+

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:45 AM, Sian January <sianjanuary@googlemail.com>  
wrote:

> Updated list:
>
> 1. HttpURLConnectionTest and HttpsURLConnectionTest fail on some
> systems [Test issue - fix available from Regis in HARMONY-6120 but may
> not be committed until after M9]
> 2. org.apache.harmony.archive.tests.java.util.jar.ManifestTest fails
> on Windows XP [Tim is working on this]
> 3. RMI test failures on Linux [HARMONY-6090, 6091 and 6092 provide a
> partial fix to this, but tests still fail intermittently]
> 4. VM crash in classlib tests on Linux -
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest and
> org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest
> 5. Classlib test failures on Vista in
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
> and org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest [Firewall  
> issue?]
> 6. hymem.exe crashes on Vista
> 7. Various AWT/Swing crashes/ failures
> 8. Dacapo benchmark failure HARMONY-6041
>
> On 18/03/2009, Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Alexei Fedotov wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> Do I understand correctly that RI correctly fires IOException for  
>>> this
>>> test case?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, if the test wasn't able to connect to "www.apache.org"
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Mark Hindess
>>> <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> In message <49BFD516.6030602@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>>>>> Sian January wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks Regis - that fixes the issue for me on Windows XP.  I'm  
>>>>>> happy
>>>>>> to check it in if another committer agrees.
>>>>> Since we see it is a test case failure, and the fix does not  
>>>>> affect the
>>>>> implementation, I suggest that it waits until after the release is
>>>>> declared.
>>>> Since we see it is a test case failure, and the fix does not  
>>>> affect the
>>>> implementation, I'd vote to fix it now. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Junit stops a test method at the first failed assert so any failure
>>>> could be hiding other "real" bugs, so if a test fix doesn't  
>>>> affect the
>>>> implementation then I think I'd always be +1 for applying it as  
>>>> soon as
>>>> possible.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mark.
>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/3/17 Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Sian January wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ok - I have tried to list all the issues from the other 

>>>>>>>> thread below,
>>>>>>>> but please add any I've missed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would be good to put a name against each of these so that
 
>>>>>>>> we know
>>>>>>>> they are being looked into.  Any volunteers?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. HttpURLConnectionTest and HttpsURLConnectionTest fail
on  
>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>> systems - change to use Jetty?
>>>>>>>> 2.  
>>>>>>>> org.apache.harmony.archive.tests.java.util.jar.ManifestTest
 
>>>>>>>> fails
>>>>>>>> on Windows XP
>>>>>>>> 3. RMI test failures on Linux
>>>>>>>> 4. VM crash in classlib tests on Linux -
>>>>>>>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
and
>>>>>>>> org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest
>>>>>>>> 5. Classlib test failures on Vista in
>>>>>>>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
>>>>>>>> and org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest
>>>>>>>> 6. hymem.exe crashes on Vista
>>>>>>>> 7. Various AWT/Swing crashes/ failures
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2009/3/16 Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>> Sian January wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> It should be the end of code freeze today but I'm
not sure  
>>>>>>>>>> we're
>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>> to vote on M9 yet without discussing all of the test
 
>>>>>>>>>> failures that
>>>>>>>>>> people have found.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It seems like the HttpURLConnection tests are test
errors  
>>>>>>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> bugs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I also think that if something fails on Windows Vista
and  
>>>>>>>>>> not on XP
>>>>>>>>>> then we probably shouldn't consider it a blocker,
though it  
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> nice to fix it in general.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For awt and swing crashes, I think these are common
(I  
>>>>>>>>>> don't think
>>>>>>>>>> Churong runs them as part of the integrity test suite)
and  
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>> allowed through in previous milestones, so I don't
think  
>>>>>>>>>> these are
>>>>>>>>>> blockers for M9.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone else offer opinions any of the other issues?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think all crash issues should be resolved before M9
 
>>>>>>>>> shipped, even
>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>> are in previous milestones, it's time to fix them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Regis.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have created a JIRA HARMONY-6120 for HttpURLConnection  
>>>>>>> tests, and
>>>>>>> attach
>>>>> ed
>>>>>>> a patch to use Jetty as test server, would anyone help to try
 
>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Regis.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Regis.
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with  
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire  
> PO6 3AU

Mime
View raw message