harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver Deakin <oliver.dea...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [M9] Testing - outstanding issues
Date Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:52:20 GMT
Ill second the rollback for M9.

Regards,
Oliver

Tim Ellison wrote:
> Regis wrote:
>   
>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>     
>>> Regis wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Sian January wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> 8. Dacapo benchmark failure HARMONY-6041
>>>>>           
>>>> I have found the cause of this regression, and had a initial patch, but
>>>> still has 1 test failure in WinFileTest. So I suggest revert r727327 if
>>>> it blocked M9.
>>>>         
>>> Yes, I think that we should probably roll back r727327 and re-open
>>> HARMONY-6041.
>>>       
>> Agree. We have a lot of duplicated code which dealing with path name,
>> we'll have enough time to refactor it in next milestone.
>>
>>     
>>> It seems that the patch was not sufficient, and the subsequent attempts
>>> to fix things (HARMONY-6090, HARMONY-6091, HARMONY-6092) have not been
>>> applied, and may cause further disruption.
>>>
>>> Since the original problem was found by inspection, I propose we leave
>>> it as a known issue with M9 and try again after the code freeze.
>>>       
>> +1
>>     
>
> Any committers second the proposal to rollback?
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
>   

-- 
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


Mime
View raw message