harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Regis <xu.re...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [M9] Testing - outstanding issues
Date Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:43:51 GMT
chunrong lai wrote:
> I have not discovered the simple reproducible test case.
> The stacktrace are listed below.
> It is also noted that the test case still pass in Linux systems. It also run
> OK in windows system if without  r727327. So there may be some porting issue
> in the new code.
>      [exec] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
>      [exec] at java.util.EventObject.(EventObject.java:47)
>      [exec] at org.osgi.framework.FrameworkEvent.(FrameworkEvent.java:155)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.Framework.publishFrameworkEvent(Framework.java:1370)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.adaptor.core.BundleFile$ZipBundleFile.checkedOpen(BundleFile.java:183)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.adaptor.core.BundleFile$ZipBundleFile.getEntry(BundleFile.java:365)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.SystemBundleData.createManifest(SystemBundleData.java:59)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.SystemBundleData.(SystemBundleData.java:31)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.adaptor.core.AbstractFrameworkAdaptor.createSystemBundleData(AbstractFrameworkAdaptor.java:548)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.SystemBundle.(SystemBundle.java:43)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.Framework.createSystemBundle(Framework.java:215)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.Framework.initialize(Framework.java:180)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.Framework.(Framework.java:106)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.OSGi.createFramework(OSGi.java:90)
>      [exec] at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.OSGi.(OSGi.java:31)
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.startup(EclipseStarter.java:272)
>      [exec] at dacapo.eclipse.EclipseHarness.startup(EclipseHarness.java:82)
>      [exec] at
> dacapo.eclipse.EclipseHarness.preIteration(EclipseHarness.java:28)
>      [exec] at dacapo.Benchmark.run(Benchmark.java:119)
>      [exec] at dacapo.TestHarness.runBenchmark(TestHarness.java:302)
>      [exec] at dacapo.TestHarness.main(TestHarness.java:242)
>      [exec] at Harness.main(Harness.java:5)
>      [exec] at
> java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
>      [exec] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:317)
>      [exec] at org.apache.harmony.vm.JarRunner.main(JarRunner.java:89)
>      [exec] ===== DaCapo eclipse starting =====
>      [exec] java.lang.IllegalStateException: Platform not running
>      [exec] at
> org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:357)
>      [exec] at dacapo.eclipse.EclipseHarness.iterate(EclipseHarness.java:35)
>      [exec] at dacapo.Benchmark.run(Benchmark.java:126)
>      [exec] at dacapo.TestHarness.runBenchmark(TestHarness.java:302)
>      [exec] at dacapo.TestHarness.main(TestHarness.java:242)
>      [exec] at Harness.main(Harness.java:5)
>      [exec] at
> java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
>      [exec] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:317)
>      [exec] at org.apache.harmony.vm.JarRunner.main(JarRunner.java:89)
>      [exec] Digest validation failed for stdout.log, expecting
> 0x46c53f7395877fc376fed4ced7500aa1ac76acdb found
> 0xda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
>      [exec] Digest validation failed for stderr.log, expecting
> 0xda39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709 found
> 0x5952005337aa363540f601f0e5d503c41612fc51
>      [exec] ===== DaCapo eclipse FAILED =====
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> chunrong lai wrote:
>>
>>>  From the snapshot testing results, as I also mentioned in
>>> HARMONY-6041<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6041>,
>>> the commit of r727327
>>> between M8 and M9 breaks one benchmark of Dacapo.eclipse. I think that we
>>> also need to understand the issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>> I didn't setup Dacapo.eclipse benchmark, so do you have any simple test
>> case to reproduce it or error messages/stack trace? That would be helpful to
>> narrow down the problem and fix it. Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Regis.
>>
> 

Thanks chunrong, I have reproduced it, investigating...

-- 
Best Regards,
Regis.

Mime
View raw message