Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40803 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2009 13:29:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2009 13:29:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 86647 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2009 13:29:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 86624 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2009 13:29:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 86613 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2009 13:29:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:29:42 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xu.regis@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.185] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:29:34 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a6so2454122tib.18 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:29:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s9t7PNmfwOwRvnaV1y8MnLs9VhsesSTqEkkfiZ3rvSw=; b=XYFFLi6rtMVaK0dYppuQizPq5+MTzbrh9KnBoC0IGBNsURjz2ywi3uad9rnDb0Fxfa 3ZP0xGWwZDMlHVxqxPaGIeFg8YtPfktjChWD14fu8hiO13rgNLpXtv4o2jkCMkP+hIq9 dUK1gWJI+0EKtORNCLGLtjL8F/4LZ/96zZRK4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tT50Bkl4t66A3/RFhB1wQonv5/GGFvG0OLSxNEJfEqLCLTNgv+YKSX72G17b9Vko9R V5cuOIF7S14GMkhgGdHeqEW7xFomNcm+ZGadnMealxQrRpM0djJjbPOhgFz98Yk+UiVF hGHf5hol7HXzdrJcE2dexaSxFUayZ9YX/H/w0= Received: by 10.110.31.5 with SMTP id e5mr6237194tie.35.1234963752928; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:29:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.4? ([61.171.22.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b4sm554048tic.16.2009.02.18.05.29.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:29:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499C0D15.2020800@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:28:53 +0800 From: Regis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: M9 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sian January wrote: > Any other opinions on postponing for a week? > > 2009/2/17 chunrong lai : >> Maybe we can postpone the release schedule by 1 week? >> I see some on-going work at the hand of my colleagues and I. >> Thanks. >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sian January >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly >>> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday >>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned >>> release date of Friday 6th March? >>> >>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would >>> like to volunteer. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Sian >>> >>> -- >>> Unless stated otherwise above: >>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number >>> 741598. >>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU >>> > > > How about EUT? Should we pass all eut before M9? -- Best Regards, Regis.