Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22023 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2009 10:29:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2009 10:29:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 89457 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2009 10:29:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 89419 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2009 10:29:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 89408 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2009 10:29:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:29:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 195.212.29.140 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mark.hindess@googlemail.com) Received: from [195.212.29.140] (HELO mtagate7.uk.ibm.com) (195.212.29.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:29:28 +0000 Received: from d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.39.193]) by mtagate7.uk.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1NAT73V509818 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:29:07 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n1NAT7Ne2560188 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:29:07 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n1NAT729013731 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:29:07 GMT Received: from anaheim.local (dhcp-9-20-183-161.hursley.ibm.com [9.20.183.161]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n1NAT7F3013728 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:29:07 GMT Message-Id: <200902231029.n1NAT7F3013728@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-16) with nmh-1.2 In-reply-to: <8833dc800902230057h36b6951q2244b5e972ff424b@mail.gmail.com> References: <8833dc800902221416q5c86599el4ba9463655a48f1e@mail.gmail.com> <5c8e69f0902221920s69c61687q38045015414b956e@mail.gmail.com> <8833dc800902230057h36b6951q2244b5e972ff424b@mail.gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Niklas Gustavsson message dated "Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:57:43 +0100." From: Mark Hindess To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: Problems with NIO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:29:07 +0000 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In message <8833dc800902230057h36b6951q2244b5e972ff424b@mail.gmail.com>, Niklas Gustavsson writes: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: > > As I take a quick look at the code, it is the native code returns > > an error code and cause the problem. However the trace does not > > contain the detail what the error code is, so we may need a simple > > testcase to debug in. > > Does running the MINA or FtpServer unit tests count as a simple > testcase? :-) If not, I'll attempt to see if I can trim it down to a > simple JUnit test case. > > > BTW, what version of Harmony are you using Niklas? (I see my file > > is a bit different in line number than the trace) > > This is using the M8 release (harmony-jdk-713673). Tim has made a few fixes in NIO since that release so it might be worth re-testing on a recent snapshot. -Mark.