harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From chunrong lai <chunrong...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: M9
Date Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:34:29 GMT
I think it is OK to publish EUT35 score with drlvm, as part of snapshot
testing. But it seems difficult to pass (100% pass rate?) all EUT35 tests in
M9.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sian January wrote:
>
>> Any other opinions on postponing for a week?
>>
>> 2009/2/17 chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Maybe we can postpone the release schedule by 1 week?
>>> I see some on-going work at the hand of my colleagues and I.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sian January
>>> <sianjanuary@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
>>>> overdue now for M9.  Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
>>>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
>>>> release date of Friday 6th March?
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
>>>> like to volunteer.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Sian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>>>> 741598.
>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
>>>> 3AU
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
> How about EUT? Should we pass all eut before M9?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message