harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [build] Help with BTI
Date Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:06:54 GMT
Yes. Sorry for not being clear.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ah, just found
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/enhanced/buildtest/trunk/infra/adaptors/snapshot/
>
> is that what you are talking about?
>
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
> > With the classlib code, you can run the tests against any JRE using...
> >
> > cd working_classlib
> > ant -Dtest.jre.home=$WORKSPACE/harmony/target/hdk/jdk/jre test
> >
> >
> > Once I have built a snapshot, is there some way to run the build test
> > framework's short integrity cycle [1] against it?  The scripts want to
> > check out all the JDK source and build it again 8-0
> >
> > [1] http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/buildtest/howto.html#Short
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> > Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> >> Tim, to reuse build results please use "snapshot" target.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sean Qiu wrote:
> >>>> AFAIK,  we can modify the <BTI>/adaptor/classlib/adaptor.xml,
 add the
> >>>> property for setup task.
> >>>>
> >>>> Index: adaptor.xml
> >>>> ===================================================================
> >>>> --- adaptor.xml (revision 740179)
> >>>> +++ adaptor.xml (working copy)
> >>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> >>>>               inheritAll="false"/>
> >>>>          <!-- Use BTI staff to execute Ant Build in new process -->
> >>>>          <exec-ant dir="${trunk.dir}" targets="rebuild">
> >>>> +            <sysproperty key="use.libstdc++6" value="true"/>
> >>>>              <sysproperty key="keep.working" value="true"/>
> >>>>              <!-- workaround on classlib-build's
> >>> InvocationTargetException
> >>>> -->
> >>>>              <jvmarg line="-Xmx1000M"/>
> >>>>
> >>>> I can't find a quick solution without modification, since it is
> >>> indirectly
> >>>> called.
> >>> Yep, that's the solution I came up with too.
> >>>
> >>> I also tried setting the property in .harmony-classlib.properties but
> >>> that didn't work for some reason I've not figured out yet.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Incidentally, I had tried to reuse the build results, rather than have
> >>> the BTI suite re-checkout and build everything again, i.e. i wanted to
> >>> test an existing build.  Again, maybe I'm just not looking in the right
> >>> places but I don't see how to achieve that either :-(
> >>>
> >>> making slow progress...
> >>> Tim
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
С уважением,
Алексей Федотов,
ЗАО <<Телеком Экспресс>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message