harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Lee <littlee1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [eut] Something about EUT relEng
Date Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:07:02 GMT
Thanks Chunrong,

I also find same situation when I run some other tests, by the way.

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:07 PM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com> wrote:

>  I tried to investigated the issue but have not succeed.
>  (1) Since it is an intermittent error in my machines, I guess that it is a
> threading-related issue.  I then tried previous of drlvm and could still
> observe the intermittent failure in M5 (r629320). I also checked RI and VME
> and have not seen such problem.
>  (2) Observed same stacktrace, I see there is no problem to parse such
> files
> in a single-threaded environment, same as what Charles observed. Looking
> more in EUT35 source, I see that EUT open the file with BufferedInputStream
> and then pass the stream to SAXParser. The stacktrace itself likely shows
> that we can read nothing from the BufferedInputStream. I guessed that
>  there
> might be some problems in drlvm when cooperated with the threaded
> BufferedInputStream but have not verified it.
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Charles Lee <littlee1032@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> > I'm running EUT releng test on the linux machine. The test is always
> > failed. Here is something I found, and need some help:
> > 1. I have encountered a " [Fatal Error] :1:20: The version is required in
> > the XML declaration." when running java-test target just like what Lai
> > ChunRong mentioned in HARMONY-6062<
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6062>,
> > but without any luck to pass the test occasionally.
> > 2. With the -consolelog, I found the log file (attached), and says
> > "java.io.IOException: The version is required in the XML declaration."
> The
> > exception is thrown by the eclipse ProfileParser, which is parsing a
> profile
> > (attached). The profile is complete. The stack trace contains no
> information
> > about harmony. With these information, I guess there maybe something
> wrong
> > when the SAXParser parse a file. So I have run a test to check SAXParser
> > only to find there is no problem to parse the same log.
> > 3. I have tested the relEng with RI. RI passed the configuration phase,
> but
> > will setup a eclipse workbench and never close it. Harmony with current
> ibm
> > vm behaves the same.
> > 4. I have tested the relEng on windows. The relEng test passed but
> behavior
> > different from what it does on linux. No workbench is setup. I have
> checked
> > the test.xml about the relEng test, find this line in the setupcompare:
> >     "only run compare test on Linux machine since it is the fastest
> > machine. Also, the compare tool only parses feature.xmls so it only needs
> to
> > be run on one machine"
> >     On linux, target setupcompare will be run. It will download a eclipse
> > with older version and change some configuration to compare with the
> newest
> > one.    I guess here is reason what makes difference.
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > --
> > Yours sincerely,
> > Charles Lee
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Yours sincerely,
> > Charles Lee
> >
> >
>



-- 
Yours sincerely,
Charles Lee

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message