harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Xiao-Feng Li" <xiaofeng...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: Re: [general] features
Date Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:15:31 GMT
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jin Mingjian <jin.phd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Xiao Feng:
>
> Thanks at all:) Do you see the moxie jvm? It seem developed by some
> intel men. And this vm was tended to contribute to harmony some time.
> I see a report about it recently. They said they hope the source will
> put into the site at sf  in 2007. But there are not..

Yes, I had been involved in Moxie project for a period but didn't keep
up with its status then after. Also, I haven't looked into various JVM
implementations, because of ACQ :)

Thanks,
xiaofeng

> Jin
>
> 2009/1/8 Xiao-Feng Li <xiaofeng.li@gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jin Mingjian <jin.phd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, Xiao Feng:
>>>
>>> I 'm interesting in your "another simpler JVM implementation". Is it
>>> public? And is there a simple working windows-friendly open source vm
>>> using the harmony class library? I do some work to make joeq using
>>> harmony harmony class library personally. (joeq, it is the only
>>> windows-friendly meta-circular JVM)
>>
>> Mingjian, The JVM I used is not public available.
>>
>>> And Rui Chu,
>>> The runtime system saving for a JVM seem the basic technque used in
>>> some meta-circular JVM bootstrapping, such as jikers rvm, joeq,
>>> although they use their own object layout and some others.
>>
>> Yes, this is what I thought as well...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> xiaofeng
>>
>>> Jin Mingjian
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel
>>
>



-- 
Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel

Mime
View raw message