harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Charles Lee" <littlee1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: testing for the newer EUT
Date Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:56:43 GMT
Hi chunrong,Regis and I will try to run EUT35 on the linux32.

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com> wrote:

> I run EUT35 in windows so far. As to EUT33, I run it in both windows and
> linux.
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Are you doing both Windows and Linux? I'm just doing Windows, Vista to
> > specific.
> >
> > -Nathan
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:08 PM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks. I'd like to have a try.
> > > Maybe you can also try the java command line running (after clean
> > > extraction) and post the running results?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Maybe the difference is the milestone I'm testing. Have you tried
> > >> moving to the next milestone release?
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:26 AM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Thanks.
> > >> > (1) My default JRE is also Harmony JVM.
> > >> >     I tried to set public JRE as SUN JRE and specify Harmony VM with
> > >> "-vm"
> > >> > in runtests.bat but just get same results as my previous running.
> > >> >
> > >> > (2) I think that there are not two JVM executables if run it with
> java
> > >> > command lines. So the harness issue does not exist if we can
> reproduce
> > >> the
> > >> > error there.
> > >> >     Yes. There are two java executables in scripts based running,
> like
> > >> the
> > >> > "jvm" and "vm" option for runtests.bat or the java executable in
> path
> > or
> > >> in
> > >> > eut.run.properties (for test.xml).
> > >> >
> > >> >      java -jar
> > >> > eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.0.v20070606.jar
> -data
> > >> > workspace -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner -file test.xml
> > >> jdttext
> > >> > -Dos=linux -Dws=gtk -Darch=x86 -Dclean=true -propertyfile
> > >> eut.run.properties
> > >> > -logger org.apache.tools.ant.DefaultLogger
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> It must be the 'jvm' property in that file. When I add that, it
> uses
> > >> >> the Harmony JRE to run the tests. However, the test harness is
> still
> > >> >> run with the public JRE (in my case, Sun's JRE).
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Would you mind trying to add "-vm path/to/harmony" to runtests
and
> > >> >> seeing what results to get from a clean start? I'd like to know
if
> > >> >> you're getting the same failures. The console output doesn't show
> > >> >> much, but when you look at the results, no tests were run and
the
> log
> > >> >> shows some weird errors in equinox.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -Nathan
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:47 AM, chunrong lai <
> > chunronglai@gmail.com>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> > I run it with
> > >> >> >  runtests -properties eut.run.properties jdtcorebuilder
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > or
> > >> >> > D:\eclipse-testing>java -jar
> > >> >> >
> > >>
> eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar
> > >> >> > -application org.eclipse.test.coretestapplication -data workspace
> > -dev
> > >> >> bin
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultFormatter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder.BuilderTests.xml
> > >> >> > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder -className
> > >> >> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder.BuilderTests -os win32
-ws
> win32
> > >> -arch
> > >> >> > x86
> > >> >> > after manual clean/extraction.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I also tried "runtests -properties eut.run.properties" and
saw
> > those
> > >> >> > jdtcorebuilder errors are reproducible.
> > >> >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Nathan Beyer <
> ndbeyer@apache.org
> > >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> When I don't specificy "-vm", then it uses the 'java'
executable
> > in
> > >> my
> > >> >> >> path that Sun's public JRE installed, for all invocations.
All I
> > have
> > >> >> >> set in my properties file is the "J2SE-1.5" property.
What does
> > the
> > >> >> >> "jvm" property do?
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> I presume you're running "runtests -properties
> eut.run.properties
> > >> all".
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> -Nathan
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:19 PM, chunrong lai <
> > >> chunronglai@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> > hi, Nathan:
> > >> >> >> >     I have not tried 3.5M4 but just tried 3.5M3.
> > >> >> >> >     According to the attched "Readme.htm", one only
needs to
> > >>  specify
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> >> > (J2SE) item of eut.run.properties (I attached mine)
and then
> run
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > runtests -properties <path to properties file>
[-os <operating
> > >> >> system>]
> > >> >> >> [-ws
> > >> >> >> > <windowing system>] [-arch <architecture>]
[-noclean] [-vm
> <path
> > to
> > >> >> java
> > >> >> >> > executable>][-Dtest.target=performance][targetname1
> targetname2
> > >> >> >> targetname3
> > >> >> >> > etc...]
> > >> >> >> >     for that. You can read the "Requirements" session
in it.
> It
> > >> seems
> > >> >> >> that
> > >> >> >> > the requirements (winzip, ant) are minimum.
> > >> >> >> >     Detailed steps of the testing can be found in
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-PDE-Automation/automation.html(around
> > >> >> >> > Fig 13).
> > >> >> >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Nathan Beyer <
> > ndbeyer@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> I've been trying to recreate these errors, can
anyone share
> the
> > >> >> >> >> specific commands, settings and tools being
used?
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> I'm trying this with the 3.5M4 builds and I
can't even get
> the
> > >> 'ant'
> > >> >> >> >> test to run when Harmony is the bootstrapping
JRE and the JRE
> > >> running
> > >> >> >> >> the actual tests.
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> -Nathan
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Gregory Shimansky
> > >> >> >> >> <gshimansky@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> > On 7 January 2009 Huang, Eric wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> Did not cath this one earlier. What
is the
> > >> jrt.core.tests.builder
> > >> >> >> >> >> about? It
> > >> >> >> >> >> almost failed completely.
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > It looks like almost all tests fail with
the same exception
> > >> >> message:
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > Build path contains duplicate
> > >> >> >> >> > entry:
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> 'D:harmony.cc/trunk/working_vm/build/windows_x86_msvc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/default/gc_gen.jar'
> > >> >> >> >> > for project 'Project'
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > Interesting how there is no '/' or '\'
after D: in the path
> > >> name.
> > >> >> Is
> > >> >> >> it
> > >> >> >> >> > a
> > >> >> >> >> > valid path in win32?
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> Eric
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> >> >> >> >> From: chunrong lai [mailto:chunronglai@gmail.com]
> > >> >> >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:32
PM
> > >> >> >> >> >> To: dev@harmony.apache.org
> > >> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: testing for the newer
EUT
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> After works on HARMONY-6020 now we
get 98.42% pass rate
> for
> > >> 26416
> > >> >> >> test
> > >> >> >> >> >> cases when running EUT35 in win32 platform
as below.
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >>  Tests
> > >> >> >> >> >> Failures  Errors  Success rate
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.ui.tests        
                  2143
> > >> >> >> >> >> 19                    1           
99.07%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model
        11138
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                    6            99.95%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler
     10216
> > >> >> >> >> >> 17                    0           
99.83%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder
        195
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                 184             5.64%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance
 1
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                    0          100.00%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.team.tests.core 
              17
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                    0          100.00%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.update.tests    
                131
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                    0          100.00%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.core.expressions.tests
      98
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                    0          100.00%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.osgi.tests      
                  504
> > >> >> >> >> >> 48                 101           70.44%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.core.tests.resources
         914
> > >> >> >> >> >> 7                   29           96.06%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.core.tests.runtime
            389
> > >> >> >> >> >> 1                     0           
99.74%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.compare.tests   
               80
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                     0           100.00%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.ant.tests.core  
                85
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                     0           100.00%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.releng.tests    
                  5
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                     0           100.00%
> > >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests  
                  500
> > >> >> >> >> >> 0                     0           100.00%
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> >>       Totally:
> > 26416
> > >> >> >> >> >> 92                 321           98.42%
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> >>  More details are posted in HARMONY-6062.
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> regards,
> > >> >> >> >> >> chunrong
> > >> >> >> >> >> Managed Runtime Technology Center,
Intel
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Nathan
Beyer <
> > >> ndbeyer@apache.org
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> > I posted a comment about this
on the JIRA issue - I
> think
> > >> this
> > >> >> is
> > >> >> >> >> >> > related to a class loading problem
I found a few weeks
> > ago.
> > >> The
> > >> >> >> >> >> > ClassNotFoundError looked familiar
- I reduced it to a
> > >> complex
> > >> >> >> >> >> > cyclical class dependency that
DRLVM couldn't load.
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6020
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:32
PM, chunrong lai
> > >> >> >> >> >> > <chunronglai@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > hi, colleagues:
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >    I'd like to update my
running status of EUT35 with
> > you.
> > >> As
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > reported
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > in HARMONY-6062, I have not
been able to run EUT35
> with
> > >> >> Harmony
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > (although it
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > is
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > fine to run EUT33 with it).
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >    The failure can be reproduced
with the long java
> > command
> > >> >> line
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > option
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > "java -jar
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >>
> > >>
> eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > -application org.eclipse.test.uitestapplication
-data
> > >> >> workspace
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > -dev
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > bin
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultForm
> > >> >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> >atter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSui
> > >> >> >> >> >> >te.xml
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests
-className
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite
-os win32
> > -ws
> > >> >> win32
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > -arch
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > x86".
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > I also attached the output
file in the JIRA, where I
> > guess
> > >> the
> > >> >> >> root
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > cause are from some Harmony
jar file constrains,
> > "!MESSAGE
> > >> >> >> Missing
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > Constraint: Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment:
> > >> JavaSE-1.6".
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >    Another interesting point
is that after the test
> case
> > >> had
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > successfully runed (so the
configuration phase has
> been
> > >> >> finished)
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > with
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > RI (with above command),
it would be no problem for
> > Harmony
> > >> to
> > >> >> >> run
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > it
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > again. This
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > somehow
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > supports our guess of some
verification failures in
> the
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > configuration
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > phase.
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:37
PM, chunrong lai
> > >> >> >> >> >> > > <chunronglai@gmail.com>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> I am running the tests,
not finished yet.
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> Thanks.
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008
at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> <t.p.ellison@gmail.com
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Are you looking at
this Chunrong?
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Tim Ellison wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > chunrong lai
wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >>   So far
Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing. It
> > looks
> > >> >> like
> > >> >> >> it
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> is
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > time
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> to
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> include
EUT3.4 now. Your suggestions/comments are
> > >> >> welcome.
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > Skip 3.4 and
go straight to the 3.5 stream tests
> > [1].
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > It would be
prudent to test using the latest
> > milestone
> > >> >> build
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > first
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > [2],
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > but if we want
to remain current then catching any
> > >> issues
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > earlier
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > in
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > the
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > integration
builds would be the thing to do.
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > How about running
then using the Apache
> > infrastructure,
> > >> >> which
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > would
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > give
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > us better control
of the jobs and insight into the
> > >> >> failures?
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > [1]
> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > [2]
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/
> > >> >> >> >> >> >index.php
> > >> >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > Regards,
> > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > Tim
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> > --
> > >> >> >> >> > Gregory
> > >> >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Yours sincerely,
Charles Lee
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message