harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Beyer <ndbe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: testing for the newer EUT
Date Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:29:44 GMT
Did you forget to attach the log? Is the error something related to an
'XInclude' class? I suspect it may actually be a concurrency issue,
which I'm able to reproduce every time. I'm running WinVista
virtually, so I'm going to tweak the virtual resources a bit and see
what happens.

-Nathan

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:08 PM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hi, Nathan:
>      I tried EUT3.5M4 today in my WinXP system and got similar results as my
> 3.5M3. Thus I think that I can proceed in EUT enabling with Harmony.
>      I have not noticed that, as I posted in HARMONY-6062, the occasional
> configuration error I met is somewhat similar as what you saw. I attached
> the log here. The error is occasional to me since (1) It only appears in
> <20% cases in the first EUT running in a clean directory (without the
> sub-directory of eclipse! You see running runtests.bat just delete and
> rebuild the sub-directory of test-eclipse). (2) Re-running Harmony against
> EUT again just fixs the error when it happens.
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> What version of Windows are you running? I'm using Vista.
>>
>> What build of Harmony are you using? I'm using a top-level build of trunk.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:13 PM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks.
>> > Here are my running logs (with EUT 3.5M3) with 100% pass rate. I am not
>> > sure
>> > why you get such failure in your side (looks in confguration phase).
>> >
>> > I may try 3.5M4 later.
>> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Here's the issue I'm seeing. I've attached the results that I'm seeing
>> >> from the 'ant' test, as run by this command.
>> >>
>> >> java -jar
>> >> eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20081201-1815.jar
>> >> -data workspace -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner -file
>> >> test.xml ant -Dos=win32 -Dws=win32 -Darch=x86 -Dclean=true
>> >> -propertyfile vm.properties -logger org.apache.tools.ant.DefaultLogger
>> >>
>> >> The 'html' results shows that no tests were run. The log file shows
>> >> some failure in loading something.
>> >>
>> >> -Nathan
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I run EUT35 in windows so far. As to EUT33, I run it in both windows
>> >> > and
>> >> > linux.
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Are you doing both Windows and Linux? I'm just doing Windows, Vista
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> specific.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Nathan
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:08 PM, chunrong lai
>> >> >> <chunronglai@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Thanks. I'd like to have a try.
>> >> >> > Maybe you can also try the java command line running (after
clean
>> >> >> > extraction) and post the running results?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Nathan Beyer
>> >> >> > <ndbeyer@apache.org>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Maybe the difference is the milestone I'm testing. Have
you tried
>> >> >> >> moving to the next milestone release?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:26 AM, chunrong lai
>> >> >> >> <chunronglai@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Thanks.
>> >> >> >> > (1) My default JRE is also Harmony JVM.
>> >> >> >> >     I tried to set public JRE as SUN JRE and specify
Harmony VM
>> >> >> >> > with
>> >> >> >> "-vm"
>> >> >> >> > in runtests.bat but just get same results as my previous
>> >> >> >> > running.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > (2) I think that there are not two JVM executables
if run it
>> >> >> >> > with
>> >> >> >> > java
>> >> >> >> > command lines. So the harness issue does not exist
if we can
>> >> >> >> > reproduce
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> > error there.
>> >> >> >> >     Yes. There are two java executables in scripts
based
>> >> >> >> > running,
>> >> >> >> > like
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> > "jvm" and "vm" option for runtests.bat or the java
executable
>> >> >> >> > in
>> >> >> >> > path
>> >> >> or
>> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> > eut.run.properties (for test.xml).
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >      java -jar
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.0.v20070606.jar
>> >> >> >> > -data
>> >> >> >> > workspace -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner
-file
>> >> >> >> > test.xml
>> >> >> >> jdttext
>> >> >> >> > -Dos=linux -Dws=gtk -Darch=x86 -Dclean=true -propertyfile
>> >> >> >> eut.run.properties
>> >> >> >> > -logger org.apache.tools.ant.DefaultLogger
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Nathan Beyer
>> >> >> >> > <ndbeyer@apache.org>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> It must be the 'jvm' property in that file. When
I add that,
>> >> >> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> >> uses
>> >> >> >> >> the Harmony JRE to run the tests. However, the
test harness is
>> >> >> >> >> still
>> >> >> >> >> run with the public JRE (in my case, Sun's JRE).
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Would you mind trying to add "-vm path/to/harmony"
to runtests
>> >> >> >> >> and
>> >> >> >> >> seeing what results to get from a clean start?
I'd like to
>> >> >> >> >> know
>> >> >> >> >> if
>> >> >> >> >> you're getting the same failures. The console
output doesn't
>> >> >> >> >> show
>> >> >> >> >> much, but when you look at the results, no tests
were run and
>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> log
>> >> >> >> >> shows some weird errors in equinox.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> -Nathan
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:47 AM, chunrong lai
<
>> >> >> chunronglai@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > I run it with
>> >> >> >> >> >  runtests -properties eut.run.properties
jdtcorebuilder
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > or
>> >> >> >> >> > D:\eclipse-testing>java -jar
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar
>> >> >> >> >> > -application org.eclipse.test.coretestapplication
-data
>> >> >> >> >> > workspace
>> >> >> -dev
>> >> >> >> >> bin
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultFormatter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder.BuilderTests.xml
>> >> >> >> >> > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder
>> >> >> >> >> > -className
>> >> >> >> >> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder.BuilderTests
-os win32
>> >> >> >> >> > -ws
>> >> >> >> >> > win32
>> >> >> >> -arch
>> >> >> >> >> > x86
>> >> >> >> >> > after manual clean/extraction.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > I also tried "runtests -properties eut.run.properties"
and
>> >> >> >> >> > saw
>> >> >> those
>> >> >> >> >> > jdtcorebuilder errors are reproducible.
>> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Nathan
Beyer
>> >> >> >> >> > <ndbeyer@apache.org
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> When I don't specificy "-vm", then it
uses the 'java'
>> >> >> >> >> >> executable
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> my
>> >> >> >> >> >> path that Sun's public JRE installed,
for all invocations.
>> >> >> >> >> >> All
>> >> >> >> >> >> I
>> >> >> have
>> >> >> >> >> >> set in my properties file is the "J2SE-1.5"
property. What
>> >> >> >> >> >> does
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> "jvm" property do?
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> I presume you're running "runtests -properties
>> >> >> >> >> >> eut.run.properties
>> >> >> >> all".
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> -Nathan
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:19 PM, chunrong
lai <
>> >> >> >> chunronglai@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > hi, Nathan:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >     I have not tried 3.5M4 but
just tried 3.5M3.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >     According to the attched "Readme.htm",
one only needs
>> >> >> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >>  specify
>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > (J2SE) item of eut.run.properties
(I attached mine) and
>> >> >> >> >> >> > then
>> >> >> >> >> >> > run
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > runtests -properties <path to
properties file> [-os
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <operating
>> >> >> >> >> system>]
>> >> >> >> >> >> [-ws
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <windowing system>] [-arch
<architecture>] [-noclean]
>> >> >> >> >> >> > [-vm
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <path
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> >> java
>> >> >> >> >> >> > executable>][-Dtest.target=performance][targetname1
>> >> >> >> >> >> > targetname2
>> >> >> >> >> >> targetname3
>> >> >> >> >> >> > etc...]
>> >> >> >> >> >> >     for that. You can read the
"Requirements" session in
>> >> >> >> >> >> > it.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > It
>> >> >> >> seems
>> >> >> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> >> >> > the requirements (winzip, ant)
are minimum.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >     Detailed steps of the testing
can be found in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-PDE-Automation/automation.html(around
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Fig 13).
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:48 AM,
Nathan Beyer <
>> >> >> ndbeyer@apache.org
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I've been trying to recreate
these errors, can anyone
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> share
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> specific commands, settings
and tools being used?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm trying this with the 3.5M4
builds and I can't even
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> get
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> 'ant'
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> test to run when Harmony is
the bootstrapping JRE and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> JRE
>> >> >> >> running
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the actual tests.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Nathan
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:35
AM, Gregory Shimansky
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <gshimansky@apache.org>
wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 7 January 2009 Huang,
Eric wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Did not cath this
one earlier. What is the
>> >> >> >> jrt.core.tests.builder
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> about? It
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> almost failed completely.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > It looks like almost all
tests fail with the same
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > exception
>> >> >> >> >> message:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Build path contains duplicate
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > entry:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 'D:harmony.cc/trunk/working_vm/build/windows_x86_msvc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/default/gc_gen.jar'
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > for project 'Project'
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Interesting how there
is no '/' or '\' after D: in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > path
>> >> >> >> name.
>> >> >> >> >> Is
>> >> >> >> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > valid path in win32?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Eric
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: chunrong lai
[mailto:chunronglai@gmail.com]
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January
07, 2009 12:32 PM
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: testing
for the newer EUT
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> After works on HARMONY-6020
now we get 98.42% pass
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> rate
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for
>> >> >> >> 26416
>> >> >> >> >> >> test
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> cases when running
EUT35 in win32 platform as below.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>  Tests
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Failures  Errors 
Success rate
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.ui.tests
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2143
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 19               
    1            99.07%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model
        11138
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
   6            99.95%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler
     10216
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 17               
    0            99.83%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder
        195
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
184             5.64%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance
 1
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
   0          100.00%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.team.tests.core
               17
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
   0          100.00%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.update.tests
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 131
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
   0          100.00%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.core.expressions.tests
      98
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
   0          100.00%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.osgi.tests
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 504
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 48               
 101           70.44%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.core.tests.resources
         914
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 7                
  29           96.06%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.core.tests.runtime
            389
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1                
    0            99.74%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.compare.tests
                  80
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
    0           100.00%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.ant.tests.core
                  85
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
    0           100.00%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.releng.tests
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 5
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
    0           100.00%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 500
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0                
    0           100.00%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>       Totally:
>> >> >> 26416
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 92               
 321           98.42%
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>  More details are
posted in HARMONY-6062.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> regards,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> chunrong
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Managed Runtime Technology
Center, Intel
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008
at 3:25 AM, Nathan Beyer <
>> >> >> >> ndbeyer@apache.org
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I posted a comment
about this on the JIRA issue - I
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > think
>> >> >> >> this
>> >> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > related to a
class loading problem I found a few
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > weeks
>> >> >> ago.
>> >> >> >> The
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ClassNotFoundError
looked familiar - I reduced it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to a
>> >> >> >> complex
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > cyclical class
dependency that DRLVM couldn't load.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6020
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Dec 25,
2008 at 10:32 PM, chunrong lai
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <chunronglai@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > hi, colleagues:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >    I'd like
to update my running status of EUT35
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > with
>> >> >> you.
>> >> >> >> As
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > reported
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > in HARMONY-6062,
I have not been able to run
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > EUT35
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > with
>> >> >> >> >> Harmony
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > (although
it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > fine to
run EUT33 with it).
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >    The failure
can be reproduced with the long
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > java
>> >> >> command
>> >> >> >> >> line
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > option
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > "java -jar
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -application
org.eclipse.test.uitestapplication
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -data
>> >> >> >> >> workspace
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -dev
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > bin
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultForm
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > >atter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSui
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >te.xml
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -testPluginName
org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -className
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite
-os
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > win32
>> >> >> -ws
>> >> >> >> >> win32
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -arch
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > x86".
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > I also attached
the output file in the JIRA,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > where I
>> >> >> guess
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> >> >> root
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > cause are
from some Harmony jar file constrains,
>> >> >> "!MESSAGE
>> >> >> >> >> >> Missing
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Constraint:
Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment:
>> >> >> >> JavaSE-1.6".
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >    Another
interesting point is that after the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > test
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > case
>> >> >> >> had
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > successfully
runed (so the configuration phase
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > has
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > been
>> >> >> >> >> finished)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > with
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > RI (with
above command), it would be no problem
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > for
>> >> >> Harmony
>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> >> >> run
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > again. This
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > somehow
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > supports
our guess of some verification failures
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > configuration
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > phase.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > On Thu,
Dec 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM, chunrong lai
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > <chunronglai@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> I am
running the tests, not finished yet.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Thanks.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> On Wed,
Dec 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> <t.p.ellison@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
Are you looking at this Chunrong?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
Tim Ellison wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> chunrong lai wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>>   So far Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>> It
>> >> >> looks
>> >> >> >> >> like
>> >> >> >> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>> is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > time
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>> include EUT3.4 now. Your
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>> suggestions/comments
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>> are
>> >> >> >> >> welcome.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> Skip 3.4 and go straight to the 3.5 stream
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> tests
>> >> >> [1].
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> It would be prudent to test using the latest
>> >> >> milestone
>> >> >> >> >> build
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> first
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > [2],
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> but if we want to remain current then
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> catching
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> any
>> >> >> >> issues
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> earlier
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> integration builds would be the thing to do.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> How about running then using the Apache
>> >> >> infrastructure,
>> >> >> >> >> which
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> would
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > give
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> us better control of the jobs and insight
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> into
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> the
>> >> >> >> >> failures?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> [1]
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> [2]
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >index.php
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> Regards,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>>
> Tim
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Gregory
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message