From dev-return-35676-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Thu Dec 18 12:37:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64489 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2008 12:37:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Dec 2008 12:37:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 13159 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2008 12:38:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 13127 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2008 12:38:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 13116 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2008 12:38:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:38:00 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chunronglai@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.249] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:37:39 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so511193rvb.0 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:37:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=h1z++0dJyE44OhRnHXpxB6QwNBPBy38o/CnlcK4Kd0Y=; b=T/8EaBKuw9AhVVhjk8PgLYZ1UXTzwXa594RG4urHNhlYPSjjqurf8PS4gpz+nguTC9 ocEcIGCSrf6+xpKqIiClmf1m788bo6OYMZ0aqUl8gz1s19H4DhTUeH1nmqjh7d2SO/9+ 2zbKhTEo3eO3381hruz4H/y0vn83Sz105K0/s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Qo3PMQeXSVJXOqOfR/9zNTHYWsM1QMHF2ZH1Wn+A9r9uuteKSTQ5AToYul+9T3EIiy TcsuRzvUcuWZpPRy4WsVwg+9vZVjiBJUAHtC+yqstszeUyalKrBGpgrJUc4zjwRuVRNQ WfkJuQwu098mIrpZA7QwuvQKOYqAJZQJpAlBU= Received: by 10.141.153.16 with SMTP id f16mr949629rvo.283.1229603839571; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:37:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.189.20 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:37:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:37:19 +0800 From: "chunrong lai" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: testing for the newer EUT In-Reply-To: <4948FE7E.4040105@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_14265_5621403.1229603839568" References: <4940E4B8.4060102@gmail.com> <4948FE7E.4040105@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_14265_5621403.1229603839568 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I am running the tests, not finished yet. Thanks. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison wrote: > Are you looking at this Chunrong? > > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > chunrong lai wrote: > >> So far Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing. It looks like it is time to > >> include EUT3.4 now. Your suggestions/comments are welcome. > > > > Skip 3.4 and go straight to the 3.5 stream tests [1]. > > > > It would be prudent to test using the latest milestone build first [2], > > but if we want to remain current then catching any issues earlier in the > > integration builds would be the thing to do. > > > > How about running then using the Apache infrastructure, which would give > > us better control of the jobs and insight into the failures? > > > > [1] http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/ > > [2] > > > http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/index.php > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > > > > > > ------=_Part_14265_5621403.1229603839568--