harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "chunrong lai" <chunrong...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: testing for the newer EUT
Date Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:14:08 GMT
hi, Pavel:

 I am using SUN JDK 1.5.07 and harmony M8 (r713673) to run EUT35.
 Thanks.

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Pavel Pervov <pmcfirst@gmail.com> wrote:

> Chunrong,
>
> What version of Sun JRE you were using for running EUT3.5?
>
> WBR,
>    Pavel.
>
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:32 AM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > hi, colleagues:
> >    I'd like to update my running status of EUT35 with you. As reported in
> > HARMONY-6062, I have not been able to run EUT35 with Harmony (although it
> is
> > fine to run EUT33 with it).
> >    The failure can be reproduced with the long java command line option
> > "java -jar
> > eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar
> > -application org.eclipse.test.uitestapplication -data workspace -dev bin
> >
> formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultFormatter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite.xml
> > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests -className
> > org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite -os win32 -ws win32 -arch
> x86".
> > I also attached the output file in the JIRA, where I guess the root cause
> > are from some Harmony jar file constrains, "!MESSAGE Missing Constraint:
> > Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: JavaSE-1.6".
> >    Another interesting point is that after the test case had successfully
> > runed (so the configuration phase has been finished) with RI (with above
> > command), it would be no problem for Harmony to run it again. This
> somehow
> > supports our guess of some verification failures in the configuration
> phase.
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I am running the tests, not finished yet.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are you looking at this Chunrong?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tim Ellison wrote:
> >>> > chunrong lai wrote:
> >>> >>   So far Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing. It looks like it is
> time
> >>> to
> >>> >> include EUT3.4 now. Your suggestions/comments are welcome.
> >>> >
> >>> > Skip 3.4 and go straight to the 3.5 stream tests [1].
> >>> >
> >>> > It would be prudent to test using the latest milestone build first
> [2],
> >>> > but if we want to remain current then catching any issues earlier in
> the
> >>> > integration builds would be the thing to do.
> >>> >
> >>> > How about running then using the Apache infrastructure, which would
> give
> >>> > us better control of the jobs and insight into the failures?
> >>> >
> >>> > [1] http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/
> >>> > [2]
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/index.php
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> > Tim
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message