harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nathan Beyer" <ndbe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: testing for the newer EUT
Date Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:25:09 GMT
I posted a comment about this on the JIRA issue - I think this is
related to a class loading problem I found a few weeks ago. The
ClassNotFoundError looked familiar - I reduced it to a complex
cyclical class dependency that DRLVM couldn't load.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6020

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:32 PM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, colleagues:
>    I'd like to update my running status of EUT35 with you. As reported in
> HARMONY-6062, I have not been able to run EUT35 with Harmony (although it is
> fine to run EUT33 with it).
>    The failure can be reproduced with the long java command line option
> "java -jar
> eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar
> -application org.eclipse.test.uitestapplication -data workspace -dev bin
> formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultFormatter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite.xml
> -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests -className
> org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite -os win32 -ws win32 -arch x86".
> I also attached the output file in the JIRA, where I guess the root cause
> are from some Harmony jar file constrains, "!MESSAGE Missing Constraint:
> Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: JavaSE-1.6".
>    Another interesting point is that after the test case had successfully
> runed (so the configuration phase has been finished) with RI (with above
> command), it would be no problem for Harmony to run it again. This somehow
> supports our guess of some verification failures in the configuration phase.
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM, chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am running the tests, not finished yet.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Are you looking at this Chunrong?
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> > chunrong lai wrote:
>>> >>   So far Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing. It looks like it is time
>>> to
>>> >> include EUT3.4 now. Your suggestions/comments are welcome.
>>> >
>>> > Skip 3.4 and go straight to the 3.5 stream tests [1].
>>> >
>>> > It would be prudent to test using the latest milestone build first [2],
>>> > but if we want to remain current then catching any issues earlier in the
>>> > integration builds would be the thing to do.
>>> >
>>> > How about running then using the Apache infrastructure, which would give
>>> > us better control of the jobs and insight into the failures?
>>> >
>>> > [1] http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/
>>> > [2]
>>> >
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/index.php
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Tim
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message