Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chunronglai@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.243 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=t+1P9hWvZQBi6nUAkf3cNaadmJVLUFqqIEHpLBwqcbK0kidcnZeMhu4nghOxDeurV1
         UTM/piA9YK50lM7Od0QuxZpkuiSrysjZdxdrb94jUZY08MvgsOOKx7RM2fl6QXRFUzTv
         itwkfW6O4iac0tllUK3AQGN2qzZyITwi5K2Qc=
Message-ID: <f9761b910811110658q5a69d65ahe91b70b05db5d18a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:58:15 +0800
From: "chunrong lai" <chunronglai@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] Declare r711744 as M8
In-Reply-To: <49198D58.9090107@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_51779_31930986.1226415495222"
References: <fc2fc95c0811100817p3be493cj161b9c5337a9f019@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4918891F.3040003@gmail.com>
	 <fc2fc95c0811110053h3dac0b58la1d55a0492333b27@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f9761b910811110056l36c4b26ekcb60544c30c5b434@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49198D58.9090107@gmail.com>

------=_Part_51779_31930986.1226415495222
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I can reproduce the error.
Zhiguo mentioned that we need to reproduce the error with -Xem:opt or
-Xem:server.


On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:

> Got it -- thanks.
>
> Can anyone else reproduce HARMONY-6013 [1] ?  It works for me with a
> simple test, but if others see a failure that would be a pretty bad
> regression...
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6013
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> chunrong lai wrote:
> >  Thanks. I am uploading the snapshots.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Sian January <
> sianjanuary@googlemail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Chunrong, are you able to make these available?
> >>
> >> 2008/11/10 Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> >>  > Sian January wrote:
> >>>> The testing cycle for r710036 [1] has been completed and the test
> >>>> results have been discussed [2].
> >>>>
> >>>> Two bug fixes [3,4] have been committed since r710036 that we want to
> >>>> include in M8. r711744 has not been through the extended testing
> >>>> cycle, but has been through the standard integrity testing cycle with
> >>>> the same results as r710036.[5]
> >>> Where are the r711744 builds?  I don't see them on the snapshots
> >>> download page.
> >>>
> >>> We have to vote on the actual archive bundle, not just a SVN tag.
> >>> I'd like to take a look and do a final sanity check.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Tim
> >>>
> >>>> As usual there are some long-standing issues and a few new ones, but
> >>>> nothing that has been considederd critical so far.  Overall the pass
> >>>> rate is better than M7.
> >>>>
> >>>> If anyone thinks that a particular issue is a blocker for M8 please
> say
> >> so here.
> >>>> Otherwise, shall we declare r711744 as M8 and unfreeze the code base?
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]  http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r710036/index.html
> >>>>
> >>>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/l72lba7xehacqyku
> >>>>
> >>>> [3] http://markmail.org/message/6fxgpa2azv27zsol
> >>>>
> >>>> [4] http://markmail.org/message/ljqwytbegtsfou2g
> >>>>
> >>>> [5] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>  --
> >> Unless stated otherwise above:
> >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> >> 741598.
> >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> >>
> >
>

------=_Part_51779_31930986.1226415495222--