Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chunronglai@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.244 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=KEImyl78ubHqAOpr2skMdFheXKQuQRq/yTB7Uk5MBrNKKZ3DAgBV1ijRGr8iWCSjzO
         L0rwzk0/U1FIT6psztZ1E5hPVFWgJXmNKzc56tBhJXEv+QH2qRHZppkjE8Uisiz8bTt+
         jYA2coEo6ItWQPMDsonAwjUn5Y0yQpU+1X/H0=
Message-ID: <f9761b910811110056l36c4b26ekcb60544c30c5b434@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:56:48 +0800
From: "chunrong lai" <chunronglai@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] Declare r711744 as M8
In-Reply-To: <fc2fc95c0811110053h3dac0b58la1d55a0492333b27@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_49164_15645567.1226393808029"
References: <fc2fc95c0811100817p3be493cj161b9c5337a9f019@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4918891F.3040003@gmail.com>
	 <fc2fc95c0811110053h3dac0b58la1d55a0492333b27@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_49164_15645567.1226393808029
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 Thanks. I am uploading the snapshots.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Sian January <sianjanuary@googlemail.com>wrote:

> Chunrong, are you able to make these available?
>
> 2008/11/10 Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
>  > Sian January wrote:
> >> The testing cycle for r710036 [1] has been completed and the test
> >> results have been discussed [2].
> >>
> >> Two bug fixes [3,4] have been committed since r710036 that we want to
> >> include in M8. r711744 has not been through the extended testing
> >> cycle, but has been through the standard integrity testing cycle with
> >> the same results as r710036.[5]
> >
> > Where are the r711744 builds?  I don't see them on the snapshots
> > download page.
> >
> > We have to vote on the actual archive bundle, not just a SVN tag.
> > I'd like to take a look and do a final sanity check.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> >> As usual there are some long-standing issues and a few new ones, but
> >> nothing that has been considederd critical so far.  Overall the pass
> >> rate is better than M7.
> >>
> >> If anyone thinks that a particular issue is a blocker for M8 please say
> so here.
> >>
> >> Otherwise, shall we declare r711744 as M8 and unfreeze the code base?
> >>
> >> [1]  http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r710036/index.html
> >>
> >> [2] http://markmail.org/message/l72lba7xehacqyku
> >>
> >> [3] http://markmail.org/message/6fxgpa2azv27zsol
> >>
> >> [4] http://markmail.org/message/ljqwytbegtsfou2g
> >>
> >> [5] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>  --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>

------=_Part_49164_15645567.1226393808029--