Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chunronglai@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.249 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=GugbAS+KUIMkJ5XSpxy+QOp6aPtgH4nTybUtBfvXEXzE7DA9WG2dQXBGUwhYQOPMim
         HWPBBq1gUM6xfGDouMqyq7eFmnFOY/yHW54TWWsfh+Te35ip3MeM051Pzv9GYplyMp+z
         QFFpYNg8pjAzsv8U/e4cL6wUwLNvRi1rTAJyM=
Message-ID: <f9761b910811061806i30e50895vcdfb92922fb69a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:06:10 +0800
From: "chunrong lai" <chunronglai@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [general] M8 code freeze now in effect
In-Reply-To: <fc2fc95c0811060641k4c8032ecxb7ea3f97b262a2d6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_19113_8400569.1226023570548"
References: <fc2fc95c0811030314t1f07ca96ybdb44cafb8ff9c6b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f9761b910811050126q5af4c4f2mb0386a36d0c5bb55@mail.gmail.com>
	 <fc2fc95c0811060641k4c8032ecxb7ea3f97b262a2d6@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_19113_8400569.1226023570548
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

hi, Sian:
    Thanks. I do not think that it is a blocking issue for M8.
    It is just a new regression for me. Say the test case runs OK in M7 but
now it is likely failed.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Sian January <sianjanuary@googlemail.com>wrote:

> Hi Chunrong,
>
> I'm not able to check this myself at the moment because I didn't have
> an existing Linux setup and I've run into some problems on the machine
> I have been trying to use.  Do you think it's a blocking issue for M8?
>
> Apart from this one potential issue I think we're looking good for M8.
>  I've done some manual testing on Windows with Eclipse and Tomcat as
> well as running the Harmony tests and everything has been fine so far.
>
> How is anyone else's testing going?  Are we ready to start voting tomorrow?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
>
> 2008/11/5 chunrong lai <chunronglai@gmail.com>:
>  >  I hope that somebody can double check the Linux running results
> > of  org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest in Classlib
> > test. I see that they are the only classlib failures in the integrity
> > testing result page now.
> >  I can reproduce the failures in my platform (from the function
> > testStartHandshake() and testGetSession()) and my previous experiments
> shows
> > that the failures will disappear if without the commit of r691267 (Remove
> > the hy.no.sig option). Unfortunately hindessm can not reproduce the error
> so
> > far.
> >  Thanks for the feedbacks and suggestions.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Sian January <sianjanuary@googlemail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> As agreed, we are now entering our code freeze for M8.  No commits
> >> allowed except for critical bug fixes and they must be approved on the
> >> dev list by at least two committers.
> >>
> >> Let's use r710036 for our snapshot testing.  Please could as many
> >> people as possible try to do some testing this week so that we can get
> >> M8 as stable as we can.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Sian
> >>
> >> --
> >> Unless stated otherwise above:
> >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> >> 741598.
> >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>

------=_Part_19113_8400569.1226023570548--