From dev-return-35249-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Fri Nov 07 02:53:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86281 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2008 02:53:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2008 02:53:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 74809 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2008 02:53:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 74758 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2008 02:53:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 74747 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2008 02:53:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:53:26 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chunronglai@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.234 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.234] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.234) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:52:09 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g9so1192rvb.2 for ; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:52:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=aM0VCMCP3dqVvatfpDiIM8jrqhCmMA7QohwrvmhiraE=; b=Fq3vmwHlB62QgmY3u+tvmreFweNzUv8h6/HOmimUCPHjVAesJ54EKMGMFqXMw7uaI5 axZqP/AUiic7HqrdpWE/wlxRlXHnE3H2+4J4KnnamWB6mamZ1hA4YfC6+eu+hKAWWHoh 74uxkfSZrY4BfeEwzK6A/25VQ/gH1hLzp9Zoc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=cIxdpLLPyS6lKbeI+0ojQ9bmLC9zuvKUGplbG1t2tzd/zG2d7W9zfoJBzaqE7ed6d9 +53n2rlBQ9QQvhzw/moV8tzpDopRVXruPu1bHPbpfyZZK6dAuTJ6yIt/Xj2K189coRo3 bXWYGpPgJztQ4wXVd9jd5smioatP4vYBGanDA= Received: by 10.140.174.11 with SMTP id w11mr1619947rve.280.1226026361770; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:52:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.189.1 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 18:52:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:52:41 +0800 From: "chunrong lai" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] M8 code freeze now in effect In-Reply-To: <49138D1F.10305@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19287_11574109.1226026361772" References: <49138D1F.10305@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_19287_11574109.1226026361772 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks Tim. Our current classlib-test adaptor in BTI infrastructure excludes test cases from AWT/SWING module. Those test cases are in classlib-gui-test but I did not see its results in previous regression reports. I also think that the failures and test case coverage for the AWT/SWING modules needs more investigation. I once did full classlib-gui-test and saw some less reproducible errors (in different runs/platforms) there, but the basic functionality looks fine. On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: > Sian January wrote: > > Hi Chunrong, > > > > I'm not able to check this myself at the moment because I didn't have > > an existing Linux setup and I've run into some problems on the machine > > I have been trying to use. Do you think it's a blocking issue for M8? > > > > Apart from this one potential issue I think we're looking good for M8. > > I've done some manual testing on Windows with Eclipse and Tomcat as > > well as running the Harmony tests and everything has been fine so far. > > > > How is anyone else's testing going? Are we ready to start voting > tomorrow? > > I see some crashes in the AWT code that are reported in JIRA already, > but they do not appear to be regressions from M7. > > Regards, > Tim > > > > > ------=_Part_19287_11574109.1226026361772--