harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sian January" <sianjanu...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Declare r711744 as M8
Date Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:53:32 GMT
Chunrong, are you able to make these available?

2008/11/10 Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> Sian January wrote:
>> The testing cycle for r710036 [1] has been completed and the test
>> results have been discussed [2].
>>
>> Two bug fixes [3,4] have been committed since r710036 that we want to
>> include in M8. r711744 has not been through the extended testing
>> cycle, but has been through the standard integrity testing cycle with
>> the same results as r710036.[5]
>
> Where are the r711744 builds?  I don't see them on the snapshots
> download page.
>
> We have to vote on the actual archive bundle, not just a SVN tag.
> I'd like to take a look and do a final sanity check.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>> As usual there are some long-standing issues and a few new ones, but
>> nothing that has been considederd critical so far.  Overall the pass
>> rate is better than M7.
>>
>> If anyone thinks that a particular issue is a blocker for M8 please say so here.
>>
>> Otherwise, shall we declare r711744 as M8 and unfreeze the code base?
>>
>> [1]  http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r710036/index.html
>>
>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/l72lba7xehacqyku
>>
>> [3] http://markmail.org/message/6fxgpa2azv27zsol
>>
>> [4] http://markmail.org/message/ljqwytbegtsfou2g
>>
>> [5] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/
>>
>



-- 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Mime
View raw message