harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wenlong Li" <wenl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [performance] Startup cost is high for Harmony (HARMONY-6002)
Date Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:06:07 GMT
Alexsey,

I didn't try the repacking approach on SPECJVM2008.startup. In my
mind, the repacking scheme may not be very helpful to performance as
more time is spent in executing user's code (startup benchmark) rather
than creating JVM.

Thx,
Wenlong

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Aleksey Shipilev
<aleksey.shipilev@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Xiao-Feng Li <xiaofeng.li@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We can offer a build option to provide separate JARs if that's
>> desirable. Does anyone really need this feature?
> That's painful, as Regis already said. But what's the benefit it would bring?
>
> Wenlong, can you show SPECjvm2008:startup.* scores with the repacked
> JARs vs. original one?
>
> Thanks,
> Aleksey.
>

Mime
View raw message