harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Xiao-Feng Li" <xiaofeng...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [performance] Startup cost is high for Harmony (HARMONY-6002)
Date Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:21:52 GMT
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> IMHO, it isn't negative to modularity of Harmony itself at developing time,
>>> but it is at deployment or runtime. For example, someone want to replace
>>> concurrent module with another implementation, he just need to replace the
>>> concurrent.jar, that's enough. But if we pack them into one big jar, he need
>>> to unpack, replace and pack again. That also work, but isn't convenient and
>>> straightforward.
>> We can offer a build option to provide separate JARs if that's
>> desirable. Does anyone really need this feature?
> It is a desirable feature for people who consume only parts of Harmony,
> or who want to subset the runtime -- though I agree that there are
> multiple ways to solve that problem.

Ok, then let's provide the extra option.


> As written elsewhere though, let's check we are solving the right problem.
> Regards,
> Tim


View raw message