harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Declare r711744 as M8
Date Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:18:55 GMT
Sian January wrote:
> The testing cycle for r710036 [1] has been completed and the test
> results have been discussed [2].
> 
> Two bug fixes [3,4] have been committed since r710036 that we want to
> include in M8. r711744 has not been through the extended testing
> cycle, but has been through the standard integrity testing cycle with
> the same results as r710036.[5]

Where are the r711744 builds?  I don't see them on the snapshots
download page.

We have to vote on the actual archive bundle, not just a SVN tag.
I'd like to take a look and do a final sanity check.

Regards,
Tim

> As usual there are some long-standing issues and a few new ones, but
> nothing that has been considederd critical so far.  Overall the pass
> rate is better than M7.
> 
> If anyone thinks that a particular issue is a blocker for M8 please say so here.
> 
> Otherwise, shall we declare r711744 as M8 and unfreeze the code base?
> 
> [1]  http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r710036/index.html
> 
> [2] http://markmail.org/message/l72lba7xehacqyku
> 
> [3] http://markmail.org/message/6fxgpa2azv27zsol
> 
> [4] http://markmail.org/message/ljqwytbegtsfou2g
> 
> [5] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/
> 

Mime
View raw message