harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Declare r711744 as M8
Date Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:12:51 GMT
+1

10.11.2008, в 19:17, "Sian January" <sianjanuary@googlemail.com>  
написал(а):

> The testing cycle for r710036 [1] has been completed and the test
> results have been discussed [2].
>
> Two bug fixes [3,4] have been committed since r710036 that we want to
> include in M8. r711744 has not been through the extended testing
> cycle, but has been through the standard integrity testing cycle with
> the same results as r710036.[5]
>
> As usual there are some long-standing issues and a few new ones, but
> nothing that has been considederd critical so far.  Overall the pass
> rate is better than M7.
>
> If anyone thinks that a particular issue is a blocker for M8 please  
> say so here.
>
> Otherwise, shall we declare r711744 as M8 and unfreeze the code base?
>
> [1]  http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r710036/index.html
>
> [2] http://markmail.org/message/l72lba7xehacqyku
>
> [3] http://markmail.org/message/6fxgpa2azv27zsol
>
> [4] http://markmail.org/message/ljqwytbegtsfou2g
>
> [5] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/
>
> -- 
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with  
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire  
> PO6 3AU

Mime
View raw message