From dev-return-35096-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Tue Oct 07 13:08:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69823 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 13:08:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 13:08:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 1433 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 13:08:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 1410 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 13:08:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 1399 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2008 13:08:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:08:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sianjanuary@googlemail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.168] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:07:45 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so3322146wfc.24 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:08:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=KV47C3004pmFzfaKQ+bVDQsgk7sxuUKwQB3rfzvMA9A=; b=CFRJe3VY8MxRss7MGiR3FRdO6o5E3civ+4QNTRTdXuxod3tnqtkZ0nyAFX7doDRNvD qGFTLf70PoYDhMmjVPP9UawCnQZdsvDNA3Ahg0PGrr70P+xHqBVGJJNDyKmJ7+pb8pXS 7gB0qyOPtJnl3s3agDueTm8CpBYISSwsV8k5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dTDCK6xQS31h6FkgBZkilX+8+jDo/yp0kuaFGb/Ma8BMab77sma9g6VkBUGWR6j1LL FOCtd2PR71ZH0ttOd7jbMcMgcOmk6tLCvdLCIdlFY/tsXljfXwRbwLk/ZKsy1KgoOSIO AlZeu8O/MUrjQS52JjNjNFikjyHUEopcAptHA= Received: by 10.114.95.1 with SMTP id s1mr7278425wab.13.1223384900150; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.127.4 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:08:20 +0100 From: "Sian January" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [tools] jretools In-Reply-To: <48EB183D.4020208@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200810061308.m96D8Vss020587@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <3b3f27c60810061824o1e6fd404tf92cd15a303920aa@mail.gmail.com> <200810070713.m977DoNc028757@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <48EB183D.4020208@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The build works for me, but I would expect to see some of the executables duplicated in both jre/bin and jdk/bin (java, javaw, keytool, policytool unpack200) and on Windows I only see them in one folder or the other. I'm just building jdktools and not the whole federated build in case that makes a difference. 2008/10/7 Tim Ellison : > Mark Hindess wrote: >> I suppose we could manage without changing package names. Initially I >> did it because I wondered if I might end up having a top-level build of >> all the classes much like we do in classlib and it made this slightly >> cleaner. But I hope there is a better way to handle the simpler >> dependencies (common classes needed by both jretools and jdktools). >> >> Now I've committed the split changing the names (again/back) would be >> trivial but I'd like to resolve the following issue first. >> >> We need to decide is if we should have two or three tools jars. (We >> could have one and include the jdktools classes in the jre but I don't >> really like that idea.) >> >> Do we make the jdktools jar depend on the jretools jar to resolve >> the common classes or do we have a separate common tools jar which >> both jdktools or jretools jars depend upon? I was thinking of going >> with just two. (We could have two with no dependencies and keep the >> duplicate classes but I don't like this idea either.) > > Just two JARs for me. The JDK depends upon the JRE in so many other > ways, that this seems quite natural in tools too. I also prefer two jars. > > Regards, > Tim > > -- Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU