harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "chunrong lai" <chunrong...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r691476 - in /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/concurrent: build.xml make/hyproperties.xml
Date Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:12:40 GMT
 Thanks. I see that the failures look OS dependent. For example, there seems
to be more failures in windows32 than Linux32(Fedora7).
 I just reproduced the failures in windows32 and Linux32(Fedora7) with the
commit, the error messages are like

     [echo] Compiling CONCURRENT tests

   [concat] No existing files and no nested text, doing nothing

    [junit] Running ExecutorsTest
    [junit] Uncaught exception in pool-12-thread-1:
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
    [junit]     at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
    [junit]     at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
    [junit]     at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:27)
    [junit]     at JSR166TestCase.threadAssertTrue(JSR166TestCase.java:218)
    [junit]     at ExecutorsTest$2.run(ExecutorsTest.java:405)
    [junit]     at
    [junit]     at
    [junit]     at
    [junit]     at
    [junit]     at
    [junit]     at
    [junit]     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:670)
    [junit] Tests run: 32, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 2.258 sec
    [junit] Test ExecutorsTest FAILED

On 9/4/08, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> chunrong lai wrote:
> > hi, Nathan:
> >     I see the commit breaks some classlib test, include
> ReentrantLockTest,
> > AbstractQueuedSynchronizerTest, ExecutorsTest and ScheduledExecutorTest,
> as
> > reported in the integrity testing. Do we need a check?
> >    One can reproduce the error in the directory of working_classlib: ant
> > -Dtest.jre.home=...\drlvm\...\jdk\jre -Dtest.case=ReentrantLockTest test.
> >     Thanks.
> In Nathan's defense, he didn't break anything but simply enabled tests
> that we should have been running.  Maybe these need JIRAs and adding to
> the exclude list until somebody steps forward to address them.
> Regards,
> Tim

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message