Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97666 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2008 10:03:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2008 10:03:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 1414 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2008 10:02:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 1152 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2008 10:02:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 1141 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2008 10:02:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:02:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sianjanuary@googlemail.com designates 209.85.146.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.177] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:01:58 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j5so266655wah.18 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:02:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=MjAwyIRMQIt3qnEBwHuge11tmHfBy83OQsiVsexPpmA=; b=Q8yYvKdqVUYDTyLPgtlXuWwPvkb6PlNCiPF5L2WOHanczFk3P5PvT71flkEr3kwBTZ gOhPqOSBSzOBzJDWbq7tR3EH4DxQpNPHyFa6qNFIhkk1BaL4yWw7ssP3ML2UvLZ8+z+l b0nvVu/6TFtWc/a6VsIzWft8fghyzlCKpfOzA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=OT0MyiIo7Dxw8EPdjsiGhYrlEtqxLIIa92HeC8qZ5/bSzkQXLnsrYHIy4iGtmrxH36 IV/c8DYafVeIIOoZTDBh/ARVyjDzYel5QxTgd+QtYoPcX3JPy08pw3bD8W1myoWgHgat tqfAak1Koc6U786A+RmDaOj3aJFMBBzqVKcK4= Received: by 10.115.88.1 with SMTP id q1mr4534312wal.122.1218535329518; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.148.6 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:02:09 +0100 From: "Sian January" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [tools] Ok to commit HARMONY-5944? (Was: [tools] Ok to commit HARMONY-5927?) In-Reply-To: <48A15DB8.5090606@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_69349_14850526.1218535329519" References: <48A15DB8.5090606@googlemail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_69349_14850526.1218535329519 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Thanks Oliver - I've committed it at r685108. Sian On 12/08/2008, Oliver Deakin wrote: > > Hi Sian, > > I support applying this patch. It should not alter the stability of the > current code base as it is an incomplete tool and a timely commit is > important to close out this GSoC project. > > Regards, > Oliver > > Sian January wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'd like to commit another patch for policytool. As Oliver mentioned >> previously, the tool is incomplete and has no impact on the rest of the >> Harmony code base. Also it's the last week of GSoC this week so it woul= d >> be >> helpful to Andr=E1s if we can check it in so he can complete his project= . >> Is >> there another commiter who will support this? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Sian >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Oliver Deakin >> Date: 4 Aug 2008 15:58 >> Subject: Re: [tools] Ok to commit HARMONY-5927? >> To: dev@harmony.apache.org >> >> Thanks Mark - I have applied the patch at repo revision r682413. >> >> Regards, >> Oliver >> >> >> Mark Hindess wrote: >> >> >> >>> In message <4896E237.7030806@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Since we're in stability phase, I'm writing to request committer suppo= rt >>>> for committing the patch supplied in HARMONY-5927. It is a patch for >>>> policytool - since this tool is incomplete, I do not think this patch >>>> will >>>> cause us any instability for our milestone build. I do not feel that >>>> this >>>> patch needs to be included in the milestone build - i.e. we can keep t= he >>>> milestone at r681495 unless other important patches are applied - as i= t >>>> is >>>> part of an incomplete tool. I do feel, however, that it would be usefu= l >>>> for >>>> Andr=E1s' progress if we could apply this patch to the repository now. >>>> >>>> Any committers support/object to this patch being applied? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> +1 >>> >>> As you say, there is no need to include this in M7. However, if we end >>> up committing other changes for the M7 then there is no real harm in >>> including this change. So, I see no reason to hold it back. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mark. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- > Oliver Deakin > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshir= e > PO6 3AU > > --=20 Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ------=_Part_69349_14850526.1218535329519--