Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sianjanuary@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.146.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        b=g3EMjysH3G9XyGz4qu8l9Z6KUqx6aaIrOb6lzT7KBYuaZvHj/Xx1k81DM2TAjpGJzB
         ZF0yqPMBNR9KaoFwCxd+r274VgW48MERv+SrEkc8URDdUvd5AetqKaAppufxyGzzUs3Z
         fgu4ItJ7LY5oMSVuzZg39uMPfrj5y91diy+jE=
Message-ID: <fc2fc95c0808120214o2e3c3d2eib4c522ba5a7fedff@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:14:46 +0100
From: "Sian January" <sianjanuary@googlemail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: [tools] Ok to commit HARMONY-5944? (Was: [tools] Ok to commit
 HARMONY-5927?)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_69093_17228718.1218532486566"

------=_Part_69093_17228718.1218532486566
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi everyone,

I'd like to commit another patch for policytool.  As Oliver mentioned
previously, the tool is incomplete and has no impact on the rest of the
Harmony code base.  Also it's the last week of GSoC this week so it would b=
e
helpful to Andr=E1s if we can check it in so he can complete his project.  =
Is
there another commiter who will support this?

Thanks,

Sian

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Oliver Deakin <oliver.deakin@googlemail.com>
Date: 4 Aug 2008 15:58
Subject: Re: [tools] Ok to commit HARMONY-5927?
To: dev@harmony.apache.org

Thanks Mark - I have applied the patch at repo revision r682413.

Regards,
Oliver


Mark Hindess wrote:

> In message <4896E237.7030806@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since we're in stability phase, I'm writing to request committer support
>> for committing the patch supplied in HARMONY-5927. It is a patch for
>> policytool - since this tool is incomplete, I do not think this patch wi=
ll
>> cause us any instability for our milestone build. I do not feel that thi=
s
>> patch needs to be included in the milestone build - i.e. we can keep the
>> milestone at r681495 unless other important patches are applied - as it =
is
>> part of an incomplete tool. I do feel, however, that it would be useful =
for
>> Andr=E1s' progress if we could apply this patch to the repository now.
>>
>> Any committers support/object to this patch being applied?
>>
>>
>
> +1
>
> As you say, there is no need to include this in M7.  However, if we end
> up committing other changes for the M7 then there is no real harm in
> including this change.  So, I see no reason to hold it back.
>
> Regards,
>  Mark.
>
>
>
>

--=20
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU


--=20
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

------=_Part_69093_17228718.1218532486566--