Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3338 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2008 02:25:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2008 02:25:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 89321 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2008 02:25:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 89290 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2008 02:25:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 89279 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2008 02:25:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:25:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chunronglai@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.172] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:24:09 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so758369wfc.24 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:24:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=xoIYGeUuVqtGINvxzqUYMC2eJtlmac3rvUEg++cgwpU=; b=eCmFwtTiF+V8rBgNTXelFdmpiU9XxiX+Z6Y09vySL0ELNaMZZ/AHJceRE1x9TOBZ3x Ka//VLbCC3leW0hY+6thB/ltCX31M/AVj7as96HN+qiqLwl/7yK6PxYAMGUF7jcsaSns AkAiBgtB4vXXqtdFX5ugmoUx0zmtapchTfBp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=a4VnpeJJNCzWOBJkABkWifWwlOrQpKNCRIxV05pBH3XYFbmfqzod2Bv9gUqBiNT8g3 NPJ7hI6d9Ra7saupx2vlsgQfgsUME4IrHpskt1g939U6C3PkhbG/oSoQHUIFro//O7GM bJpgrGNDV2+F1Ee5AK/WBaiJSzrVNV0+MW5eY= Received: by 10.142.157.15 with SMTP id f15mr3533040wfe.291.1217557476145; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.11.10 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:24:36 +0800 From: "chunrong lai" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] Code frozen for M7? In-Reply-To: <4891A98F.4050701@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_49480_21711853.1217557476140" References: <4891A98F.4050701@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_49480_21711853.1217557476140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I can see the failures in r674840. I guess the failure started earlier. I'd like to figure it out. Thanks. http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r674840/index.html On 7/31/08, Tim Ellison wrote: > > We are down to two failures in the classlib tests on windows according to > > > http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/windows_x86/classlib-test/ > > I don't see those failing when using the IBM VM. Any DRLVMers notice when > this started failing? > > Thanks, > Tim > > chunrong lai wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Should we freeze the code base for M7, since the Jul. 28th is said to >> be >> the code freeze date? >> If so, I think >> (1) We should follow Tim's policy "no more commits please without >> agreement from two committers on the dev list" before code unfrozen. >> (2) We need to nominate the M7 candidate revision, do more testing, >> analyze the critical/blocker issues and raise the issues MUST be fixed for >> M7. >> >> Thanks. >> Chunrong Lai >> Intel System Software Division >> >> ------=_Part_49480_21711853.1217557476140--