Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45904 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2008 02:11:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2008 02:11:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 14244 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2008 02:11:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 14222 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2008 02:11:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 14202 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2008 02:11:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:11:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.189] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:10:06 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y6so432032tia.18 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:10:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=X6uWFm0JziYWKFzGd39jkTtF0fpAYQJQYeyiDG1eln8=; b=PWnUBPZLgMjWiD11oamFT2yRAQDCLNCZCFP2n16OhSgvnZgyZw6KBKy05ejFN37dh2 BqABHzZLiO5rd1j+gst9dkBG7yJrd5R7mRYli/hw51bM7qlLUBIjmzudV4RyX5Ng2qIO kp4bzb15DGMRxybMQ6tzk9YzWDtrVoaHJVTds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=UzOLlZ4vzx7fLr9LyzPCyllcEYTbkiO/c+vcTayg5rDr1ia9q0uX+ahLAcnn45Pwwp 4+tRE9t6Eij8JIGC3qcgMaRds1FX5ylQaYfscjfu4XFJERqUn1jwPglQ9dUzDjdDrvvJ Hvth/CMD7vo2N0WkvWBtxsgRVzk1LzV4CQ+I4= Received: by 10.110.46.3 with SMTP id t3mr844993tit.30.1219284633952; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:10:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.53.19 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:10:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <94d710af0808201910u57898312i481545cb59a48a24@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:10:33 +0800 From: "Sean Qiu" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] M8 In-Reply-To: <200808200759.m7K7xGWW012002@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200808200759.m7K7xGWW012002@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 We should have a green status for our unit tests always. I've found same problems in Java 6 branch. 2008/8/20 Mark Hindess : > > There are a number of known test failures that we have allowed to remain > unfixed for several releases now. I think we should create a JIRA > for M8 and add some (all?) of these issues as blockers[0] as soon as M7 is > released in order to focus some attention on these issues. > > What do others think? > > -Mark. > > [0] Blockers in JIRA terminology but I really mean "would-like-to-fix" > since it is almost certainly unrealistic to expect all of them to be > fixed and some may slip to M9 or beyond. > > -- Best Regards Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu China Software Development Lab, IBM