Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nbeyer@gmail.com designates
 209.85.217.14 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=Px86RHGY7EJzxPvuND1G+PS044sWsmcdpM49wZAAGSynlSR4cTZ4XXJhbS4u9F3n5V
         SiG7O4EGBCd/5ZuRF0qleyjhHPtvusVuWgBao/ivgN1+OfPxB2d73PMUIuT6LKOHkhNz
         7YwGB1NMLIRtY9mWzxOzoCAhLXE4ZaSA03x0s=
Message-ID: <3b3f27c60808181831v46b68344h628c1f2b4b57d97@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:31:38 -0500
From: "Nathan Beyer" <ndbeyer@apache.org>
Sender: nbeyer@gmail.com
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] Declare r681495 as M7
In-Reply-To: <fc2fc95c0808180107l2fd4e3d1r8180f6d1442094bd@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <fc2fc95c0808150626x86b374ck891eb9b5eaa7cff9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3b3f27c60808171957r5b25f214hdcb43e58509a0116@mail.gmail.com>
	 <fc2fc95c0808180107l2fd4e3d1r8180f6d1442094bd@mail.gmail.com>

Test:   	testWithSql
Class:  	org.apache.harmony.unpack200.tests.ArchiveTest
	
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[ LocalVariableTable: ]>
but was:<[]>
	at org.apache.harmony.unpack200.tests.ArchiveTest.testWithSql(ArchiveTest.java:94)
	at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
Test:  	testHelloWorld
Class:  	org.apache.harmony.unpack200.tests.SegmentTest
	
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[ LocalVariableTable: ]>
but was:<[]>
	at org.apache.harmony.unpack200.tests.SegmentTest.testHelloWorld(SegmentTest.java:125)
	at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Sian January
<sianjanuary@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Nathan - would you mind posting more the failure messages for the
> unpack200 tests?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
> On 18/08/2008, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
>> -1 I'm not able to reproduce the same results on x86_64 Ubuntu Hardy
>>
>> Here are the failures I'm seeing, consistently, in classlib-test. The
>> unpack200 test failures concern me.
>>
>> error   testGetAttribute
>>        org.apache.harmony.lang.management.MemoryPoolMXBeanImplTest
>> error   testGetCollectionUsage
>>        org.apache.harmony.lang.management.tests.java.lang.management.MemoryPoolMXBeanTest
>> failure         testWithSql     org.apache.harmony.unpack200.tests.ArchiveTest
>> failure         testHelloWorld  org.apache.harmony.unpack200.tests.SegmentTest
>> failure         test_impliesLjava_security_Permission
>>        tests.api.java.security.PermissionCollectionTest
>>
>> Here are the failures I'm seeing, consistently, in jdktools-test.
>>
>> error   testDebuggerLaunch001
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.DebuggerOnDemand.OnthrowDebuggerLaunchTest
>> error   testDebuggerLaunch002
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.DebuggerOnDemand.OnthrowDebuggerLaunchTest
>> error   testDebuggerLaunch003
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.DebuggerOnDemand.OnthrowDebuggerLaunchTest
>> error   testDebuggerLaunch004
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.DebuggerOnDemand.OnthrowDebuggerLaunchTest
>> error   testAttachConnector001
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.MultiSession.AttachConnectorTest
>> error   testClearBreakpoint001
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.MultiSession.BreakpointTest
>> error   testMethodEvent001
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.MultiSession.MethodEntryExitTest
>> error   testResume      org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.MultiSession.ResumeTest
>> error   testThreadEnd001
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.MultiSession.ThreadEndTest
>> error   testThreadStart001
>>        org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.MultiSession.ThreadStartTest
>>
>> drlvm-test and drlvm-reg-test are passing.
>>
>> -Nathan
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Sian January
>> <sianjanuary@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > We have completed a testing cycle for r681495 and evaluated the results [1].
>> >
>> > There are some test failures, but most of them are either intermittent
>> > or were also failing in M6.  However if anyone thinks any of these
>> > test failures are blockers and has not yet had a chance to say, please
>> > speak up now.
>> >
>> > Otherwise, shall we declare r681495 as M7?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Sian
>> >
>> >
>> > [1] http://harmony.markmail.org/message/cpfcnslv53doueeg?q=
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Unless stated otherwise above:
>> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
>> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>