Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46137 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2008 20:09:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2008 20:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 38625 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 20:09:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 38597 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 20:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 38586 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2008 20:09:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:09:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aleksey.shipilev@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.249] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:08:18 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so1040571rvb.0 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:08:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=Fds5tgvQ4RML1njQLkPOsEaSYqEaDOhKTZywgIbYhag=; b=BUy8FK1PJWcnj8IMzdH2tO1o3nF8m4OsTH0SqPpwWs8fpiRyc6ajdsQs7dQ7jJo6lB UFiTAwwueue5mDrADBjrH7gS9L18jVzw3S0OebzXpfJhBjDn/HRE23axGP9w+rcqDlL+ UpMFHdcYfPL9HJXKbXoIfRSmAPTQ0b4fizqFM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Ik32l1kDUdr16/ICDNCP+Dd3G4PGBiWZ4aEkJDiTeB6heneHSdC0/TBeMmdgHgFy0x V/xSVBasROhARqyaNW8mW5JNBCUneJF+HyA7ksD/MPW8BVakyVy/LLr/GDEXA0UAqQoP dvVSj0K2xKLFf1/7jmBZTd8KSh+6LlcjD+tOk= Received: by 10.140.172.19 with SMTP id u19mr80664rve.31.1215115718995; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.51.9 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4bebff790807031308x7fee5f50j58d52a4f53461472@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 00:08:38 +0400 From: "Aleksey Shipilev" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: [general][performance] Stefan Krause's Harmony performance evaluation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org TWIMC, Stefan Krause publishes another review on Java vs. C performance here: http://www.stefankrause.net/wp/?p=9#comments It seems like Harmony has "a long way to go" in performance :) I'm gonna look on some of these tests in near term. Thanks, Aleksey.