From dev-return-34565-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Fri Jul 11 13:22:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48094 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2008 13:22:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2008 13:22:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 23182 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2008 13:22:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 22642 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2008 13:22:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 22631 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2008 13:22:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:22:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aleksey.shipilev@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.249] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:21:48 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so3753890rvb.0 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:22:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=8JMHtVw1a73ZpVwWXu79lZDc5halYOS9G0jLzS4AA8Y=; b=Z6KplwyUmTr3lod6B8GYKFpmlmQ2m1VFgcLzqpPA7kr0mVweqvjPYshKhxxQxz9M2r u2ka2ctz7pHtN7JlIIh7M58rzR6wObo1WKhKWzW6VL/PNk1ZJ8m8GIR8P5KzDRLcKFMg 7JP51F8ks2+AUez6CYC56DwWy4AbU+4RMttLk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=p1H8txBX+6frWMoLvtubtDVc552vamJaN50k3Q0jPgON684uymGUuuqS5m0n7Q/ABp iTZzNH6E9XkHS2UPB0rtbYtd0iDslOKYcG5AqMLpUPsGu66AkmI64qEggS7ACBA8SYJ8 gZo0qd2tfSXijo3Y95tj/4D5x9kkPtLRABw+g= Received: by 10.115.18.1 with SMTP id v1mr13890161wai.15.1215782530969; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.167.15 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4bebff790807110622t52c0ce7cj50de5defee9f47c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:22:10 +0400 From: "Aleksey Shipilev" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: [classlib][pack200] Move to Java 1.5? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Sian, Andrew! Can we port pack200 to Java 1.5? Is there any rationale to stay with Java 1.4? It would improve the code readability a lot: explicit iterators would go away, some classes can be generalized, etc. Thanks, Aleksey.