harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Xiao-Feng Li" <xiaofeng...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general][performance] Stefan Krause's Harmony performance evaluation
Date Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:49:10 GMT
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 5:04 AM, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@apache.org> wrote:
> On 4 июля 2008 Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> TWIMC,
>>
>> Stefan Krause publishes another review on Java vs. C performance here:
>> http://www.stefankrause.net/wp/?p=9#comments
>>
>> It seems like Harmony has "a long way to go" in performance :)
>> I'm gonna look on some of these tests in near term.
>
> It is interesting to see that IBM is often quite close to Harmony in
> performance. In fact Harmony acts quite well in its current state. I think
> though that performance for Java is always a 2nd priority after stability.
> Look at IBM, its Java is targeted at servers where stability is what is
> important.
>
> Looking at the occasional test failures on the alerts mail list it seems like
> stability is the number one focus for improvement and it is a by far harder
> to move in that direction.


Agreed. I actually never worried much about Harmony's performance. But
stability really is a touch job...

> --
> Gregory
>



-- 
http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
Mime
View raw message