Java 6 branch isn't taken into our consideration, am i right?
2008/7/29 Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org>:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> chunrong lai wrote:
>>
>>> Should we freeze the code base for M7, since the Jul. 28th is said to
>>> be
>>> the code freeze date?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. I thought that we had a well understood procedure now that we are on
>> our seventh milestone -- but I guess it is still necessary to call it out.
>>
>> If so, I think
>>> (1) We should follow Tim's policy "no more commits please without
>>> agreement from two committers on the dev list" before code unfrozen.
>>> (2) We need to nominate the M7 candidate revision, do more testing,
>>> analyze the critical/blocker issues and raise the issues MUST be fixed for
>>> M7.
>>>
>>
>> The code is frozen for new features or non-critical bug fixes this week.
>> Nathan asked that he gets his suncompat code in there, which is fine since
>> that is disabled by default anyway.
>
>
> I checked my code in last night, so I'm good to go for testing.
>
>
>>
>>
>> The focus is on stability and passing our tests. We should discuss any
>> non-critical bug fixes and later this week expect to nominate a release
>> candidate.
>>
>> (p.s. I'm disappearing on vacation for a couple of weeks after this week,
>> so I'll only be around to help up to that point)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>
--
Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
|