Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sianjanuary@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.198.250 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=G9iJNZS2RpquuG+83f9Uh/ahm72uVRbHe0BetHHc9z6txgyqY2HHPAw7EisHKR/3mNXNTFypbWq038tPAoMEwSOKHK6CvDDfjSif8SMz+IfFjOtNiix9Q7wczOp18bpsQh6cr6LAmVY5WLgpcL71lT9GnEcJ1+zLdZxjk2yhfuY=
Message-ID: <fc2fc95c0805080533j6d95cc88l47cfda227939966b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 13:33:25 +0100
From: "Sian January" <sianjanuary@googlemail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [M6] [Test Failure] Commit fix for pack200 test failure?
In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0805080315i66a7eae8h78f5d6badd1f8784@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_847_30076089.1210250005213"
References: <fc2fc95c0805080156o299ab6e6g422ae1f925fe11e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0805080315i66a7eae8h78f5d6badd1f8784@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_847_30076089.1210250005213
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Ok - that sounds fine to me.  Should I check in a commented-out test so we
can get a clean test run, or just leave it as is?

On 08/05/2008, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/8/08, Sian January <sianjanuary@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I've just noticed there's a pack200 test failing, both on my machine and
> on
> > the build machine.  I'd like to check in a fix - it should be fairly low
> > risk as none of the other modules depend on pack200.  Does that sound ok?
> >
>
> I assume that the risk is low but I expect that the issue is not
> critical. So I'd suggest waiting till the end of test results
> evaluation. If there are other issues for fixing/committing then I
> think it is OK to commit the fix for pack200 and repeat full testing
> again. Otherwise, I'd release r653525 as M6 without the fix for
> pack200 - IMHO one not critical issue shouldn't hold M6 milestone
> release.
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sian
> >
> > --
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> >
>


-- 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

------=_Part_847_30076089.1210250005213--