From dev-return-33215-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Wed Apr 02 17:42:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54935 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2008 17:42:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2008 17:42:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 46014 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2008 17:42:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 45985 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2008 17:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 45976 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2008 17:42:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:42:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of senakafdo@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.188] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:41:24 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d10so1113771tib.18 for ; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:41:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=rXYc/PU/b/YqyAfKE2ZIu4+qhjJiUaMqkqnI7iMc2Z4=; b=Pa9HdC2eUwoEM0A6aPFZLKMVPPPmmD5+kNO3ScZlxQsb57WlrOyFSIAP0E17Sw+9V1ANNvrE/qm282bZ14mVOmqsEjCrGiljpDJPMid67YB8ppvT4cfJcp7dGV23kmmsEhVrOqPhv1BoPWzESspq6wHS0WDG/ztUPJNYB9ipg2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Ei8rR/RZK+G8DrbF82l+X/r7BXlBIHLKb0LSQZQFGhj3GM7nEQbc7DD/UXIqLWN4mHdxkWN70hsOlR8OqQ61V93i5eK7oEWvum+b/hXOGEvrG0UlFjHTcjD3H4mCdiHK34MHPUWm77GoGHGi66/nXgX6lip4eZN5erJaH9VgcUo= Received: by 10.110.20.17 with SMTP id 17mr4312303tit.45.1207158095668; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.41.11 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8812c4670804021041i712e4a99k7b5dee943cc30d2d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 23:11:35 +0530 From: "Senaka Fernando" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Creating separate make file fro gc_gec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7599_17385143.1207158095669" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_7599_17385143.1207158095669 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, Currently, the makefile for gc_gen is located inside the drlvm/trunk/make/vm folder. However, in the process of making gc_gen an independent entity, isn't it better that we move this to drlvm/trunk/vm/gc_gen/make and refer it from, drlvm/trunk/make/vm/gc_gen.xml? Thoughts? Regards, Senaka ------=_Part_7599_17385143.1207158095669--