harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][archive] Parsing invalid manifest (was: Re: classlib archive changed broke EUT/update)
Date Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:59:14 GMT
I use this wording for the web site (http://harmony.apache.org) sources
(located at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/standard/site).
The web site generator uses Harmony to convert from xml documents
(located at site/xdocs) to html documents (located at site/docs).



On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Nathan Beyer <nbeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's the "Harmony documentation system"?
>
>  -Nathan
>
>  On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
>
>
>  > Hello Nathan,
>  > What else is blocked by the fact that we mandate manifest versions in
>  > manifests? I was asking myself the same question. This night I found
>  > out that Harmony documentation system depends on it. More precisely,
>  > Anakia refuses to load Apache commons. This means we have to set up a
>  > workaround until "commoners" fix their manifest.
>  >
>  > Thanks.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=ndbeyer@apache.org>>
>
> > wrote:
>  > > I just got through getting the Eclipse guys to fix their test artifacts.
>  > >  Argh...
>  > >
>  > >  Keep in mind - this isn't a manifest in some long-used application,
>  > this is
>  > >  a mocked up manifest used in a test case. I'd like to get a better
>  > feeling
>  > >  for how many real invalid manifest files are out there. So far it's
>  > just
>  > >  three files in some test cases, which have already been fixed. What
>  > else is
>  > >  out there?
>  > >
>  > >  -Nathan
>  > >
>  > >
>
>
> > >  On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=t.p.ellison@gmail.com>>
>  > wrote:
>  > >
>  > >  > Even though the manifest is invalid according to the spec, shouldn't
>  > we be
>  > >  > parsing it the same way as the RI for compatibility reasons?
>  > >  >
>  > >  > I wonder how many apps have invalid manifests.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Regards,
>  > >  > Tim
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Nathan Beyer wrote:
>  > >  >
>  > >  > > Careful, the test isn't necessarily invalid - that's quick
>  > assumption.
>  > >  > > It
>  > >  > > needs to be verified that the test isn't dyanamically generating
a
>  > >  > > manifest
>  > >  > > with Harmony's classlib; it's possible that Harmony's classlib
is
>  > >  > > creating
>  > >  > > the invalid manifest, which later causes a failure when reading
the
>  > >  > > manifest.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > -Nathan
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Vladimir Beliaev <
>  > >  > > vladimir.k.beliaev@gmail.com<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=vladimir.k.beliaev@gmail.com>
>  > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=vladimir.k.beliaev@gmail.com
>  > >>
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > > > wrote:
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  According to the issue quick evaluation the tests are invalid,
so
>  > noted
>  > >  > > > revision helped to detect them. The tests are to be excluded
now.
>  > >  > > >
>  > >  > > > Tim, Alexei, thank you for your input.
>  > >  > > >
>  > >  > > > Thanks
>  > >  > > > Vladimir
>  > >  > > >
>  > >  > > > 2008/4/18, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>
>  > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>
>  > >  > > > <
>  > https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=alexei.fedotov@gmail.com
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > >
>  > >  > > > > :
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > > > Tim,
>  > >  > > > > We are sorting that out.
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > > > Thanks.
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Tim Ellison <
>  > t.p.ellison@gmail.com<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
>  > <https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
>  > >  > > > > <
>  > https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > > > wrote:
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > It'll be a couple of days before I can look at it
as I'm
>  > going
>  > >  > > > > > away.
>  > >  > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > I'll
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > take a look when I get back if nobody beats me to
it.
>  > >  > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > >  Regards,
>  > >  > > > > >  Tim
>  > >  > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > >  Vladimir Beliaev wrote:
>  > >  > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > >  Tim,
>  > >  > > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > > I've opened
>  > >  > > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > HARMONY-5747<
>  > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5747>
>  > >  > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > > which
>  > >  > > > > > > reports regression in EUT/update suite due
to r641928
>  > >  > > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > >      [apply patch
>  > >  > > > > > > HARMONY-4569<
>  > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4569>
>  > >  > > > > > > ([classlib][performance]
>  > >  > > > > > > Ineffecient manifest parsing results in slowdown
when
>  > debugging
>  > >  > > > > > > java
>  > >  > > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > code)]
>  > >  > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > > Could you take a look at regression & get
it resolved,
>  > please?
>  > >  > > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > > Thanks
>  > >  > > > > > > Vladimir
>  > >  > > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > >
>  > >  > > > > > >
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > > > --
>  > >  > > > > With best regards,
>  > >  > > > > Alexei
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > > > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > With best regards,
>  > Alexei
>  >
>



-- 
With best regards,
Alexei

Mime
View raw message