harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mackie Mathew" <mcclou...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [harmony-demo-1] Reasons for java.awt.ComponentTest failure
Date Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:32:28 GMT
How do events get registered in the oldEventsMap in ComponentTest? I cannot
find put method being called when events occur? How do events get registered
when graphical events occur?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Sergey Salishev <
sergey.i.salishev@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> If you look into waitForEvent impl, you'll see it assigns event field. I
> agree it's not the best idea to relay on method's side effect. Some other
> tests use Event event = waitForEvent(... to do the same check and it
> looks clearer to me. But the test by itself seems valid.
>
> Thanks.
> Sergey.
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Mackie Mathew <mccloud35@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The testAction method that fails is due to:
> >
> > public final void testAction() {
> >       int eventId = Event.ACTION_EVENT;
> >        myTestComp = new MyButton();
> >        createFrameAndWait();
> >        robot.setAutoDelay(700);
> >        Point screenLoc = myTestComp.getLocationOnScreen();
> >        int centerX = myTestComp.getWidth() / 2;
> >        int centerY = myTestComp.getHeight() / 2;
> >        screenLoc.translate(centerX, centerY);
> >        final Point absPos = screenLoc;
> >
> >        waitForEvent(new Runnable() {
> >            public void run() {
> >                robot.mouseMove(absPos.x, absPos.y);
> >                robot.mousePress(InputEvent.BUTTON1_MASK |
> > InputEvent.BUTTON2_MASK);
> >                robot.mouseRelease(InputEvent.BUTTON1_MASK |
> > InputEvent.BUTTON2_MASK);
> >            }
> >        }, eventId, waitTime);
> >    *    assertNotNull(event);*
> >        Event actionEvt = new Event(myTestComp, eventId,
> >                ((Button) myTestComp).getLabel());
> >        actionEvt.modifiers = Event.ALT_MASK;
> >        checkOldEvent(actionEvt);
> >    }
> >
> >
> > The private variable event is declared to null at setUp() and it is not
> > changed and checked for not being null. I do not understand the logic
> > behind
> > this. Shouldn't the test obviously fail as event is not assigned a not
> > null
> > value.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tharindu
> >
>



-- 
Regards,

Tharindu

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message