harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gregory Shimansky <gshiman...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [drlvm] upgrade apr, apr-util to 1.2.12
Date Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:26:29 GMT
On 1 April 2008 Nathan Beyer wrote:
> I've just finished testing on Win x86 with the new apr code and no
> patches. All of the kernel.test, smoke.test, reg.test and cunit.test
> pass without failure or error.
>
> If there's no objection, I'm going to update to the latest apr source
> and remove the patches tonight.

Just to make sure, did you define some environment variable with no string 
value ("" empty string) before running kernel tests?

> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
> > I've tested apr 1.2.12, apr-util 1.2.12, apr-iconv 1.2.1 on Linux
> >  x86_64 with the patched unix code removed and the DRLVM tests seem to
> >  all be passing. I'm running the tests again to be sure. I'm also
> >  running the tests on Linux x86.
> >
> >  On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
> >  > Is there any specific reason we're still on apr/apr-util 1.2.6?
> >  >
> >  >  I'm trying to get things running on Leopard and it seems 1.2.12 is
> >  >  necessity. How do we want to approach such an upgrade?
> >  >
> >  >  I noticed that the apr-iconv is also a bit out of date.
> >  >
> >  >  -Nathan

-- 
Gregory

Mime
View raw message